Catalog Number MCS20 |
Device Problems
Sticking (1597); Activation, Positioning or Separation Problem (2906); Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
|
Patient Problem
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
Event Date 06/08/2015 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during an unknown procedure, the doctor was creating a free flap.The sister said that the clips did not deploy properly and the device was stuck on the vessel itself.The doctor could not open the jaws.Another like device was used to complete the procedure.There were no adverse consequences for the patient reported.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).No device received for analysis at time of submission of 3500a when additional information is received and/or the device analysis has been completed, a supplemental medwatch will be sent.Additional information was requested and the following was obtained: how was the device removed from the vessel.The vessel was clamped on both ends, dissected and the clip applier slipped out of the vessel.After which they used ligaclips to clip of the ends vessel.Was the vessel damaged after the device was removed from the tissue.The vessel was not damaged as they had intended to ligate it.Did the clip feed sideways, or feed slowly into the jaws of the device.The surgeon was not too sure whether there was a clip deployed or not as the jaws of the clip applier could not open.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).Additional information: the analysis results found that mcs20 was returned in good visual condition.In an attempt to replicate the reported incident, the instrument was functionally tested; upon cycling the handles were noted to be loose and would not close the jaws as intended; no functional testing could be performed due to the returned condition of the instrument.The device was disassembled in order to evaluate the condition of the internal components and the extension spring was observed to be out of position and damaged; this condition contributed that the handles were loose and that the device could not be cycled as intended.No conclusion could be reached as to what may have caused the reported incident.The batch history records were reviewed with no anomalies noted during the manufacturing process.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|