Upon receipt from the dentist of the device involved in the mdr event, nakanishi conducted a failure analysis of the returned device that included an attempt to measure the retention force of the operating device.These activities are described in more detail below: methodology used: a) nakanishi examined the device history records for the subject sx-su03(serial number (b)(4)).B) nakanishi conducted a visual inspection of the returned device and performed a simple movement test.There were no visible abnormalities, such as cracks or debris, on the outside of the handpiece.C) nakanishi measured bur detachment force by setting a test bur in the handpiece and confirmed it was 17.7n.Nakanishi's acceptance criteria for the bur detachment force is 25.0n or above, indicating that the bur detachment force of the subject handpiece had deteriorated.Nakanishi disassembled the handpiece to observe the inside of the chuck, compared to an unused new chuck and took photographs.Nakanishi observed the accumulation of the dirt.Conclusion reached: the bur detached from the handpiece due to the deterioration of the bur retention torque that was caused by the accumulation of the dirt inside of the chuck.Nakanishi believes that there are two causes for the wear of the chuck: 1.The handpiece had been used with the dirt and debris inside the chuck.2.The handpiece was used under the load and rotational speed that were higher than those specified with the retention capacity of the chuck.Nakanishi reminded the user of the cleaning instruction included in the user manual in order to prevent the dirt or debris accumulated inside the chuck.
|