Catalog Number 6541-1-723 |
Device Problems
Break (1069); Manufacturing, Packaging or Shipping Problem (2975)
|
Patient Problems
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199); No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
Event Date 06/15/2015 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
The sales rep has reported on behalf of the customer that one of the devices reported under ra 2014-069 has allegedly come apart during surgery.Further information has been requested from the sales rep.The customer has reported that there was no significant delay in surgery and that surgery was completed successfully.Additional information from the sales rep: following the alleged instrument break, the surgeon completed the surgery using another device from a different tray.Additional time added onto surgery of less than 10 minutes.What happened: the surgeon pinned the distal femoral cutting block to the bone as per recommended operative technique.The distal capture device was then clipped into place and the surgeon started to complete the resection with a standard reciprocating saw and the distal capture block fell apart into 5 pieces.All pieces were retrieved and are being sent back to the office.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
When completed, the investigation results will be submitted in a supplemental report.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
An event regarding weld failure and pin dissociation of the modular capture was reported.The event was confirmed.Method & results: -device evaluation and results: a visual inspection confirmed the event.The cross pin was loose from the action trigger.-medical records received and evaluation: not performed as patient factors did not contribute to the event.-device history review: all devices accepted into final goods conformed to specification.-complaint history review: there have been similar reported events.Conclusions: the subject device has been identified as within the scope of nc and related capa where the cross pin located in the action trigger came loose during surgery.Further investigation identified a lack of press fit between the pin and action trigger.As a result, (b)(4) was implemented to raise awareness of the potential for weld disassociation through distribution of a product correction bulletin.Once conforming product is commercially available, stryker will replace all distal captures currently located in the field that exhibit the non-conformance.Replacement will occur on a rolling basis.Capa root cause: in-process manufacturing tolerance change made at supplier location without formal change control process and adequate assessment of deliverables to be implemented.Notification to stryker also missed due to lack of change control.
|
|
Event Description
|
The sales rep has reported on behalf of the customer that one of the devices reported under (b)(4) has allegedly come apart during surgery.Further information has been requested from the sales rep.The customer has reported that there was no significant delay in surgery and that surgery was completed successfully.Additional information from the sales rep: following the alleged instrument break, the surgeon completed the surgery using another device from a different tray.Additional time added onto surgery of less than 10 minutes.What happened: the surgeon pinned the distal femoral cutting block to the bone as per recommended operative technique.The distal capture device was then clipped into place and the surgeon started to complete the resection with a standard reciprocating saw and the distal capture block fell apart into 5 pieces.All pieces were retrieved and are being sent back to the office.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|