• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH UNIX UNI KNEE TIB BEAR INSERT; IMPLANT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH UNIX UNI KNEE TIB BEAR INSERT; IMPLANT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 4540-0210
Device Problems Connection Problem (2900); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199); No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 06/08/2015
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
When completed, the investigation results will be submitted in a supplemental report.
 
Event Description
(b)(6) at the clinic, reported the following event to (b)(4) : "incorrect adaptation between the tibial insert and metallic baseplate.Change for a polyethylene insert.No adverse consequences.".
 
Manufacturer Narrative
An event regarding seating/locking issues involving a unix uni knee tib bear insert was reported.The event was not confirmed.Method & results: -device evaluation and results: damage was noted on the underside of the tibial insert likely caused during attempted implantation.A dimensional inspection was performed and the device was confirmed to be the correct size.-medical records received and evaluation: no patient history was provided and no adverse consequences to the patient were reported.-device history review: review indicated all devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no relevant reported discrepancies.A review of the inspection guide sheet associated with the dhr did not indicate any evidence of a dimensional issue.100% inspection was carried out for all features for all units within the lot, all of which conformed to the required specifications.-complaint history review: review indicated there have been no other similar events for the reported lot.Conclusions: the exact cause of the event could not be determined, the damage on the returned device however likely occured during attempted implantation.A review of the dhr indicated that 100% inspection was carried out for all features for all units within the lot, all of which conformed to the required specifications prior to shipment from stryker orthopaedics.No further investigation is required at this time.If further relevant information becomes available this investigation will be re-opened.
 
Event Description
Pharmacist at the clinic, reported the following event to (b)(6) ca ansm: "incorrect adaptation between the tibial insert and metallic baseplate.Change for a polyethylene insert.No adverse consequences.".
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNIX UNI KNEE TIB BEAR INSERT
Type of Device
IMPLANT
Manufacturer (Section D)
STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH
325 corporate drive
mahwah NJ 07430
Manufacturer (Section G)
STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-CORK
ida industrial estate
carrigtwohill NA
Manufacturer Contact
beverly lima
325 corporate drive
mahwah, NJ 07430
2018315000
MDR Report Key4921936
MDR Text Key22473413
Report Number0002249697-2015-02375
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HRY
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeFR
PMA/PMN Number
K923011
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional,other
Reporter Occupation Pharmacist
Type of Report Followup
Report Date 06/24/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date01/31/2016
Device Catalogue Number4540-0210
Device Lot NumberCPPKD04A
Other Device ID NumberSTERILE LOT# 11010P
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer07/10/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received Not provided
Initial Date FDA Received07/17/2015
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received11/17/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured11/24/2011
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-