• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: RESPIRONICS CALIFORNIA, INC V60 VENTILATOR; VENTILATOR, CONTINUOUS, MINIMAL VENTILATORY SUPPORT,FACILITY USE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

RESPIRONICS CALIFORNIA, INC V60 VENTILATOR; VENTILATOR, CONTINUOUS, MINIMAL VENTILATORY SUPPORT,FACILITY USE Back to Search Results
Model Number V60
Device Problem Volume Accuracy Problem (1675)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
The customer reported that the ventilator volume is reading low.The customer reported that the unit was in use on patient, but there was no patient harm.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Patient information was requested and the customer refused, reporting the information is confidential.(b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
V60 VENTILATOR
Type of Device
VENTILATOR, CONTINUOUS, MINIMAL VENTILATORY SUPPORT,FACILITY USE
Manufacturer (Section D)
RESPIRONICS CALIFORNIA, INC
2271 cosmos court
carlsbad CA 92011
Manufacturer Contact
phyllis mccarthy
2271 cosmos court
carlsbad, CA 92011
MDR Report Key4931948
MDR Text Key6050885
Report Number2031642-2015-01356
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MNT
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCH
PMA/PMN Number
K082660
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Biomedical Engineer
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 07/08/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberV60
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 07/08/2015
Initial Date FDA Received07/22/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured05/17/2013
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-