• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SYNCARDIA SYSTEMS, INC. SYNCARDIA FREEDOM DRIVER; CIRCULATORY ASSIST DEVICE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SYNCARDIA SYSTEMS, INC. SYNCARDIA FREEDOM DRIVER; CIRCULATORY ASSIST DEVICE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 595000-001
Device Problems Device Alarm System (1012); Device Displays Incorrect Message (2591); Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
Patient Problems No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199); No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 07/14/2015
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
The customer reported that the freedom driver exhibited a red alarm possibly due to the patient's fluid overload condition.The customer also reported that the patient was switched to a circulatory support system (css) console without any adverse patient impact.This alleged failure mode poses a low risk to the patient because it did not prevent the driver from performing its life-sustaining functions.The freedom driver will be returned to syncardia for evaluation.The results of the investigation will be provided in a supplemental mdr.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Testing also determined that the root cause of the reported fault alarm was corrosion of the internal bond wires within the u22 pressure sensor on the main printed circuit board assembly (pcba).Despite the u22 bond wire corrosion and fault alarm, the freedom driver passed all pressure test requirements which included cardiac output (co), pulmonary aortic pressure (pap), arterial pressure (aop) , left atrial pressure (lap) and right atrial pressure (rap) performance metrics associated with nominal normotensive and hypertensive settings.The main pcba was replaced, the driver was serviced and passed all final performance testing.This failure mode posed a low risk to the patient because it did not prevent the freedom driver from performing its life-sustaining functions.Syncardia has initiated a corrective action (capa) to address the issue of u22 pressure sensor failures.The investigation is in process.Potential corrective actions will be evaluated when the root cause investigation has been completed.Syncardia has completed its investigation of this complaint and is closing this file.
 
Event Description
The freedom driver was returned to syncardia for evaluation.Review of the electronic data confirmed the customer- reported with a "bottom pressure too low" fault."bottom pressure too low" faults are typically indicative of a degrading u22 pressure sensor component on the main pcba.During performance testing, the driver exhibited a fault alarm immediately upon startup, duplicating the customer-reported issue.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SYNCARDIA FREEDOM DRIVER
Type of Device
CIRCULATORY ASSIST DEVICE
Manufacturer (Section D)
SYNCARDIA SYSTEMS, INC.
tucson AZ 85713
Manufacturer Contact
carole marcot, esq. svp raq
1992 e. silverlake rd.
tucson, AZ 85713
5205451234
MDR Report Key4939767
MDR Text Key22563603
Report Number3003761017-2015-00234
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LOZ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P030011
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type consumer,health professional
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Remedial Action Replace
Type of Report Followup
Report Date 07/14/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/20/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number595000-001
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Date Returned to Manufacturer07/16/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received07/14/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/01/2011
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age65 YR
-
-