• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: NEUROPACE, INC. NEUROPACE RNS SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

NEUROPACE, INC. NEUROPACE RNS SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Model Number RNS NEUROSTIMULATOR
Device Problem Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problems Edema (1820); Swelling (2091)
Event Date 09/25/2014
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
On (b)(6) 2014: the patient was implanted with the rns neurostimulator and four cortical strip leads (cl-315-10-k).The leads are placed as follows: two were placed in the left mesial temporal region and two were placed in the left temporal region.On (b)(6) 2014: dr.(b)(6) reported that her patient implanted on (b)(6) 2015 is complaining of speech-related issues and was admitted to the hospital.The patient's strip leads cover wernike's (speech) area.It was thought that the speech issues might be related to swelling and the steroid taper was modified and the patient sent home.On (b)(6) 2014: the patient was re-admitted for the same issues.Medical affairs received the following email from dr.(b)(6): "i have a patient here at (b)(6) recently implanted with neuropace electrodes who has developed some focal findings most likely attributable to swelling and vasogenic edema (now three weeks out).I wonder if we could talk about your experience with steroids following implantation.She is on a dexamethasone taper, and i will need to decide whether to extend the taper with watchful waiting or intervene." we responded to dr.(b)(6) with some information on the patients in our clinical trials that were on steroids.The patient's steroid taper was then again adjusted and she was sent home.We have heard nothing from the patient since.On 10/14/2014 -product monitoring notes - case review with dr.(b)(6) and (b)(6) (neuropace medical affairs team).Swelling / edema is an expected result of surgery, there is no indication that this issue was caused or contributed by the rns system.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).On 5/07/2015 neuropace, inc.Voided this complaint.There was no reported product malfunction.This is an anticipated behavior associated with lead placement and craniotomy procedures.On 07/21/2015 neuropace, inc.Reopened and reevaluated this record.Based on internal review of the fda regulations, guidance document (draft guidance for industry and food and drug administration staff), and internal procedures, neuropace, inc.Determined that complaints associated with craniotomy procedures are reportable.There is no indication of product failure.Device remains implanted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
NEUROPACE RNS SYSTEM
Type of Device
NEUROPACE RNS SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
NEUROPACE, INC.
455 n. bernardo ave.
mountain view CA 94043
Manufacturer (Section G)
NEUROPACE, INC.
455 n. bernardo ave.
mountain view CA 94043
Manufacturer Contact
ramona gonis
455 n. bernardo ave.
mountain view, CA 94043
6502382788
MDR Report Key4954107
MDR Text Key6635029
Report Number3004426659-2015-00022
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code PFN
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P100026
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 07/24/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Physician
Device Model NumberRNS NEUROSTIMULATOR
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 09/25/2014
Initial Date FDA Received07/30/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age41 YR
-
-