Mfg site eval: the movable part of the jaw was broken off of the received device.The visual investigation shows, that the instrument was maintained, but not at aesculap technical service.This can be seen by the taped aesculap label and the foreign label "biotech 08/14".Also, the instrument was analyzed by microscope and hardness testing was completed.The analysis of the fracture pattern illustrated a forced fracture.No pores, inclusions or foreign bodies could be found at the point of rapture.The fracture origin as well as the further processing is located in 3.3.Approximately 50% of the fracture surface shows a dark-brown discoloration.This is a hint for a pre-existing crack, which caused crevice corrosion.The fracture surface shows an intergranular appearance.The rivet of the jaw is slightly deformed.The hardness test confirmed the pre-set values.Set point: 42-50 hrc; results: 49, 6 hrc.The breakage can be attributed to the maintenance of the third-party service or during a surgery by overstressing the instrument due to bending or leverage.An indicator of too high leverage is the deformed pin.The pin and instrument surface should be flush.Corrective action.
|