There was no death or device malfunction associated with the inappropriate defibrillation.The patient was taken to the hospital for further evaluation.Device evaluation was accomplished through a review of the patient's downloaded data file.Review of the data does not indicate any device malfunction related to the defibrillation event.Device manufacture date: monitor sn : 01/23/2015 - reuse.Electrode belt sn (b)(4): 09/25/2014 - reuse.Inappropriate defibrillations are an anticipated risk associated with the use of the lifevest.Patients are instructed through alarms, voice messages, ifu, and training to press the response buttons to prevent an inappropriate defibrillation.(b)(4).A summary of the safety and effectiveness data (ssed), including the inappropriate defibrillation safety objective supporting fda's approval of the lifevest, can be found at http://www.Accessdata.Fda.Gov/cdrh_docs/pdf/p010030b.Pdf.
|
A us distributor contacted zoll to report that a patient experienced an inappropriate defibrillation event.It was reported that the patient was wiping down the shower in a correction facility at the time of the event.The patient was reportedly lightheaded and dizzy at the time of the event.After review of the downloaded data, it was confirmed that the patient received one inappropriate treatment at 20:30:52 on (b)(6) 2015.Atrial fibrillation with a rapid ventricular response contributed to the false detection.A review of the downloaded data confirms that the response buttons were pressed intermittently, but the response buttons were not pressed during the treatment sequence that resulted in the inappropriate defibrillation treatment.The patient was sent to the hospital for further evaluation.
|