• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - COSTA RICA (COYOL) ASCERTA¿; STENT, URETERAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - COSTA RICA (COYOL) ASCERTA¿; STENT, URETERAL Back to Search Results
Model Number M0061456130
Device Problems Calcified (1077); Difficult to Remove (1528)
Patient Problem Unspecified Infection (1930)
Event Date 07/16/2015
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Device code relates to problem code for the reported event of stent difficult to remove.Device code relates to problem code for the reported event of stent calcified.The complainant indicated that the device was disposed and will not be returned for evaluation; therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device could not be completed.If any further relevant information is identified, a supplemental mdr will be filed.
 
Event Description
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that an ascerta¿ ureteral stent that was previously implanted in the ureter approximately 1 month prior to the stent removal procedure performed on (b)(6) 2015.Reportedly, about a month prior to the stent removal procedure, and after the stent was implanted, it was observed that the bloody urine has not improved and the physician thought that an infection has developed due to the presence of cloudy urine.Thus, they decided to remove the stent.According to the complainant, the patient was noted to have "bloody urine" and the ascerta¿ ureteral stent was implanted to treat this condition.There was no issue noted to the device during the stent placement procedure.After the stent placement, (exact timeframe unknown) drainage was bad and the patient urine was noted to be cloudy, therefore the physician decided to remove the stent and place a new stent.Reportedly, the physician had planned to remove the stent "sooner than one month".During the stent removal procedure on (b)(6) 2015, the guidewire would only advance to the middle of the stent due to an occlusion suspected caused by the bloody urine or a possible infection.Due to the occlusion, the physician decided to attempt removing the stent with forceps.However, the pigtail of the stent could not be straightened.The removal of the stent was not completed due to this event.Open surgery was performed to remove the stent on (b)(6) 2015.The stent was removed successfully from the patient, and the stent was noted to be calcified.There were no patient complications as a result of this event and the current condition of the patient was reported to be stable.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ASCERTA¿
Type of Device
STENT, URETERAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - COSTA RICA (COYOL)
2546 first street
propark free zone
alajuela
CS 
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - COSTA RICA (COYOL)
2546 first street
propark free zone
alajuela
CS  
Manufacturer Contact
nancy cutino
100 boston scientific way
marlborough, MA 01752
5086834000
MDR Report Key5000834
MDR Text Key22876712
Report Number3005099803-2015-02280
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FAD
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K974541
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Physician
Report Date 07/17/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date01/29/2017
Device Model NumberM0061456130
Device Catalogue Number145-613
Device Lot Number17631055
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received Not provided
Initial Date FDA Received08/13/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured02/26/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-