• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC, INC. AORTIC AP; HEART-VALVE, MECHANICAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC, INC. AORTIC AP; HEART-VALVE, MECHANICAL Back to Search Results
Model Number 505DA18
Device Problem Mechanical Jam (2983)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 07/30/2015
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Product analysis: no product has been returned.Conclusion: based on the information available, no conclusion can be drawn with this event.Additional information regarding the nature and details of the event have been requested, but not received at the time of this report.When the complaint product has been evaluated and additional event information received, a follow-up report will be submitted.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
Medtronic received information that following implant of this 18mm mechanical valve, the valve was explanted and replaced with a non medtronic 19mm valve due to leaflet impingement.The physician reported that the implant was difficult.No product performance issues were detected prior to implant, and no adverse patient effects were reported.Post explant, the physician reported there were no abnormalities with the valve.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information was received from the implanting physician that this valve could not be implanted due to the patient's physiology, and that there was no product problem.(b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Product analysis: upon receipt of the returned product specimen, the valve appeared clean with no evidence of blood contact.The valve did not show evidence of the reported impingement.Both leaflets were observed in the closed position and appeared to be intact with no evidence of damage, such as cracks and/or surface anomalies.Both inflow and outflow valve hinge mechanisms and orifices appeared to be intact with no evidence of damage.Conclusion: the device history record was reviewed and showed that this product met all manufacturing specifications for product released for distribution.No issues were identified that would have impacted this event.The root cause of the reported issue could not be determined as the valve was inspected and tested and no anomalies were found.Based on the additional information received, the reported issue has been attributed to the patient¿s physiology and not the device.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AORTIC AP
Type of Device
HEART-VALVE, MECHANICAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC, INC.
3800 annapolis lane
minneapolis MN 55447
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC STRUCTURAL HEART
8200 coral sea street ne
mounds view MN 55112
Manufacturer Contact
paula bixby
8200 coral sea street ne
mounds view, MN 55112
7635055378
MDR Report Key5027824
MDR Text Key23950406
Report Number3008592544-2015-00032
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LWQ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCH
PMA/PMN Number
P990046
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 11/03/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/25/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/16/2020
Device Model Number505DA18
Device Catalogue Number505DA18
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer08/04/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received11/03/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/18/2013
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age00050 YR
-
-