• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BIOMET ORTHOPEDICS BI-ANGULAR HUM HD COCR 48X19MM; PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BIOMET ORTHOPEDICS BI-ANGULAR HUM HD COCR 48X19MM; PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER Back to Search Results
Model Number N/A
Device Problem Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923)
Patient Problems Unspecified Infection (1930); Joint Dislocation (2374); No Code Available (3191)
Event Date 08/27/2008
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Current information is insufficient to permit a conclusion as to the cause of the event.Review of device history records show that lot released with no recorded anomaly or deviation.There are warnings in the package insert that state that this type of event can occur: under possible adverse effects, number 4 states, "dislocation of the bipolar shoulder component has been reported.".
 
Event Description
It was reported that patient underwent a total shoulder arthroplasty on (b)(6) 2006.Subsequently, patient was revised on (b)(6) 2008 due to dislocation.The proximal body, glenoid tray, bearing, head, and intercalary segment were removed and replaced.Patient was further revised on (b)(6) 2008 due to unknown reasons.The glenoid tray was removed and replaced with a custom component.A third revision procedure has been indicated due to infection; however, no revision procedure has been reported to date.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This follow-up report is being filed to relay additional information, which was unknown at the time of the initial medwatch.
 
Event Description
It was reported that patient underwent a total shoulder arthroplasty on (b)(6) 2006.Subsequently, patient was revised on (b)(6) 2008 due to dislocation.The proximal body, glenoid tray, bearing, head, and intercalary segment were removed and replaced.Patient was further revised on (b)(6) 2008 due to unknown reasons.The glenoid tray was removed and replaced with a custom component.Additional information received reported that a third revision procedure occurred approximately 6 months ago due to infection.During the procedure, the glenoid and humeral stem were removed, and the procedure was completed with competitor spacers.Patient underwent a reimplantation procedure on (b)(6) 2016.Custom products were used to complete the procedure.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This follow-up report is being filed to relay additional information, which was unknown at the time of the initial medwatch.This report is number 3 of 5 mdrs filed for the same event (reference 1825034-2015-03546 / 2015-03547 / 2015-03831 / 2016-01156 / 2016-01159).
 
Event Description
It was reported that patient underwent a total shoulder arthroplasty on (b)(6) 2006.Subsequently, patient was revised on (b)(6) 2008 due to dislocation.The proximal body, glenoid tray, bearing, head, and intercalary segment were removed and replaced.Patient was further revised on (b)(6) 2008 due to unknown reasons.The glenoid tray was removed and replaced with a custom component.Additional information received reported that a third revision procedure occurred approximately 6 months ago due to infection.During the procedure, the glenoid and humeral stem were removed, and the procedure was completed with competitor spacers.Patient underwent a reimplantation procedure on (b)(6) 2016.Custom products were used to complete the procedure.Additional information received reported that a future revision procedure has been indicated due to dislocation; however, another revision has not been reported at this time.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This follow up report is being filed to relay corrected information.
 
Event Description
Patient's left shoulder was revised approximately 29 months post-implantation due to dislocation.During the procedure, the proximal body, glenoid tray, glenoid bearing, humeral head and humeral intercalary segment were removed and replaced.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This follow-up report is being submitted to relay additional information.If any further information is found which would change or alter any conclusions or information, a supplemental will be filed accordingly.Zimmer biomet will continue to monitor for trends.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
BI-ANGULAR HUM HD COCR 48X19MM
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER
Manufacturer (Section D)
BIOMET ORTHOPEDICS
56 e. bell drive
warsaw IN 46582
Manufacturer (Section G)
BIOMET ORTHOPEDICS
56 e. bell drive
warsaw IN 46582
Manufacturer Contact
megan haas
56 e. bell drive
warsaw, IN 46582
5743726700
MDR Report Key5032508
MDR Text Key24136106
Report Number0001825034-2015-03831
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MBF
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
PK032895
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Followup,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 05/18/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Physician
Device Expiration Date02/28/2015
Device Model NumberN/A
Device Catalogue Number114024
Device Lot Number566850
Other Device ID NumberN/A
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received Not provided
Initial Date FDA Received08/26/2015
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
04/20/2018
04/20/2018
04/20/2018
Supplement Dates FDA Received02/18/2016
04/07/2016
09/20/2016
05/18/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured02/04/2005
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Removal/Correction NumberN/A
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age52 YR
-
-