It was reported that there was breakage at the tip of the delivery shaft of a 6f 9.0mmx30mm precise pro stent delivery system during flushing prior to use.It appeared to be cracked.They stopped using this device and changed to a same-like one to complete the procedure.There was no report of patient injury.The device was stored, handled, and prepped according to the ifu.There weren't any anomalies or other damages noted to the device or packaging prior to use.The device had not yet been advanced to the target lesion during use.The device will be returned for analysis.
|
Complaint conclusion: the tip of a 9 x 30mm precise pro rx stent delivery system (sds) was noted to be cracked while being flushed prior to use.The procedure was successfully completed with a similar device.The site reported that the device had been stored, handled and prepped according to the instructions for use (ifu).There were no anomalies or damage noted to the device or its¿ packaging prior to use.The site reported that the tip of the sds was noted to be cracked while they were flushing it.The device was not used in the patient and the procedure was successfully completed with a similar device with no reported patient injury.One non-sterile precise pro rx ous carotid system, 6f, 9mm x 30mm, 135 cm catheter was received for analysis inside a plastic bag with the stent in a separate small plastic bag.A breakage at the tip of the delivery shaft was noted.No other anomalies were observed.The tip of the unit was inspected under the vision system and a scratch/crack was observed on the distal tip.Sem analysis revealed that the external surface had evidence of scratches/slits on the catheter tip.This damage was consistent with the action of a sharp object applied from a distal to a proximal direction on the catheter¿s distal tip.A review of the manufacturing records for this lot of products revealed that it met specification prior to release.The manufacturing process was reviewed and there were no tools, equipment or product handling that could have caused this type of damage.The reported ¿catheter tip - cracked¿ event was confirmed based on the visual analysis of the device.However, the exact cause of this damage could not be conclusively determined during the analysis; but does not appear to be related to the manufacturing process.According to the product ifu, users are instructed to carefully inspect the packaging and device for any damage and to not use the device if they suspect that the sterility and/or device performance has been compromised.It is difficult to draw a clinical conclusion between the device and the event based on the information available.However since the damage does not appear to have occurred during the manufacturing process, handling of the device at the site may have contributed to it.Neither the device history record review nor the product analysis suggests that the reported event could be related to the manufacturing process.Therefore, no corrective actions will be taken.
|