(b)(4).The device was not returned for eval.Pursuant to atricure's internal processes, the complaint was escalated to a level ii investigation.During the investigation, the device history record for lot 13734-111214 was reviewed for non-conformance reports and reworks, none were found that related to this defect.All 83 devices from this lot passed their 100% inspecting, which includes verifying that the magnet is present and secure.An investigation of this failure mode determined that insufficient adhesive can allow the magnet to become dislodge, therefore, capa (b)(4) was imitated to improve the adhesive application process.
|
It was reported during a minimally invasive procedure, that the magnet became dislodged from the tip of the magnetic retriever.The dislodged magnet was found attached to the tip of the partner magnet, and was therefore retrieved without issue.The facility re-glued the magnet using their own adhesive, prolonging the procedure five minutes.The pt outcome was not affected.
|