• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK INC UNIVERSA FIRM URETERAL STENT SET; FAD STENT, URETERAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK INC UNIVERSA FIRM URETERAL STENT SET; FAD STENT, URETERAL Back to Search Results
Model Number N/A
Device Problem Knotted (1340)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 07/10/2015
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).The event is currently under investigation.
 
Event Description
During a ureteroscopy procedure, a knot at proximal end of stent in distal ureter was noted.The physician was unable to remove the stent due to the knot.A holmium laser was used to cut the knot in the stent.A 5 fr stent piece was removed and placed with a 6 fr stent.The procedure was completed without further incident.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.On 28aug2015, during the investigation of a similar incident (mdr# 1820334-2015-00528) it was determine to make this event reportable.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Event evaluation: the device was not returned to assist in the investigation; however, reviews of the complaint history, device history record, documentation, manufacturing instructions, instructions for use (ifu), drawing, and quality control records were conducted during the investigation.The review of manufacturing history indicates there were no identified nonconformities within this lot.There is no evidence to suggest this product was not manufactured to current specifications.The ifu cautions that improper handling can seriously weaken the stent.Acute bending or overstressing the stent during placement may create high stress concentrations and weaken the material's strength, thus potentially leading to twisting and knotting of the stent while in the patient.Individual interactions between stents and the urinary system are unpredictable and it is suggested to complete a periodic evaluation of the stent via cystoscopic, radiographic, or ultrasonic means.Based on the available information, the root cause is unable to be determined.We will continue to monitor for similar complaints.The appropriate internal personnel have been notified.No further action is required.
 
Event Description
During a ureteroscopy procedure, a knot at the proximal end of stent, in distal ureter was noted.The physician was unable to remove the stent due to the knot.A laser was used to cut the knot in the stent and a 5 fr stent piece was removed and placed with a 6 fr stent.The procedure was completed without further incident.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.On (b)(6) 2015, during the investigation of a similar incident (mdr# 1820334-2015-00528) it was determined to make this event reportable.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNIVERSA FIRM URETERAL STENT SET
Type of Device
FAD STENT, URETERAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK INC
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer Contact
larry pool
750 daniels way
bloomington, IN 47404
8123392235
MDR Report Key5050701
MDR Text Key24875521
Report Number1820334-2015-00569
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FAD
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K961446
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Report Date 07/10/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberN/A
Device Catalogue NumberUFH-500-R
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Distributor Facility Aware Date07/10/2015
Device Age4 MO
Event Location Hospital
Initial Date Manufacturer Received Not provided
Initial Date FDA Received09/02/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured03/03/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-