• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. RUBY COIL; HCG, KRD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. RUBY COIL; HCG, KRD Back to Search Results
Catalog Number RBY2C0512
Device Problem Device-Device Incompatibility (2919)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 07/30/2015
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Results: the pet lock was intact.The pusher assembly was kinked approximately 5.0 cm, 13.0 cm, 17.0 cm, 47.0 cm, 54.0 cm, 82.0 cm, and 100.0 cm from the proximal end.The coil was intact with the pusher assembly, and compressed distally away from the proximal constraint sphere.The pet lock was intact.The coil was intact with the pusher assembly, and compressed distally away from the proximal constraint sphere.Conclusion: the complaint has been evaluated.The initial complaint indicated that the ruby coils were advanced through a 5f diagnostic catheter and met resistance.This type of failure typically occurs due to improper handling during use.If the ruby coil is attempted to be advanced through a catheter other than a 0.025" microcatheter, it is likely that delivery of the coil through the catheter will fail.Evaluation of the returned devices revealed that the coils of both ruby coils were compressed distally away from the proximal constraint sphere.This type of damage typically occurs due to withdrawing the coil into the introducer sheath against resistance.This may cause the coils to become offset, increasing the outer diameter of the coil.If the coil is compressed it will likely cause difficulty manipulating the coils.[-1] the kinks along the pusher assembly of the first ruby coil evaluated were likely due to improper return packaging.These devices are 100% visually and functionally evaluated during in-process inspection.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.This mdr is associated with mdr 3005168196-2015-00895.
 
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure using ruby coils.During the procedure, the physician met resistance while advancing a ruby coil through another manufacturer's diagnostic catheter and it was removed.While advancing a new ruby coil through the diagnostic catheter the physician met resistance again and removed the ruby coil.The procedure continued using another manufacturer's system.There was no report of an adverse effect on the patient.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RUBY COIL
Type of Device
HCG, KRD
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer (Section G)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
kathleen kidd
one penumbra place
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key5072253
MDR Text Key25627679
Report Number3005168196-2015-00894
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HCG
UDI-Device Identifier00814548012896
UDI-Public00814548012896
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K120330
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Report Date 08/14/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Physician
Device Expiration Date02/29/2020
Device Catalogue NumberRBY2C0512
Device Lot NumberF62606
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer08/25/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received Not provided
Initial Date FDA Received09/11/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured02/09/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age57 YR
-
-