• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK IRELAND LTD ZILVER PTX DRUG-ELUTING PERIPHERAL STENT; NIU STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY, DRUG-ELUTING

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK IRELAND LTD ZILVER PTX DRUG-ELUTING PERIPHERAL STENT; NIU STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY, DRUG-ELUTING Back to Search Results
Catalog Number ZIV6-35-125-6.0-120-PTX
Device Problem Occlusion Within Device (1423)
Patient Problems Reocclusion (1985); Claudication (2550)
Event Date 08/12/2015
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Pma/510(k)#: p100022 and s001.The ziv6-35-125-6.0-120-ptx stent of lot number c778568 was implanted in the patient therefore is not available for evaluation.With the information provided a document based investigation was carried out.It was confirmed that images would not be available and no further information will be provided to support the complaint investigation.Available information stated that the patient had pre-existing conditions including: hypertension, hypercholesterolemia and was a smoker.According to complaint information provided, worsened claudication was observed on the patient.It can be noted that this symptom indicates progression of peripheral artery disease and can also be associated with the restenosis process.Restenosis is a common adverse event of endovascular procedures and can be caused by injury to the vessel (e.G.During pta and/or stenting).Vessel injury provokes an inflammatory response that leads to (or amplifies) the restenosis process.It may be noted that surface of the zilver ptx stent is coated with the drug (paclitaxel) to help prevent subsequent restenosis of the artery.It can be therefore stated that it is very unlikely that the reported restenosis could have occurred due to zilver ptx malfunction; however a definitive cause of this event cannot be determined.Due to limited information and lack of imaging no other comments can be made.As no imaging was available to support the complaint investigation, the complaint is confirmed based on customer testimony.It may be noted that worsened claudication and restenosis of the stented artery are known potential adverse events associated with placement of this device.Prior to distribution all zilver ptx devices are subject to visual inspection and functional checks to ensure device integrity.A review of the relevant manufacturing records revealed no discrepancies that could have contributed to this complaint.According to information provided pta and stent placement were preformed against restenosis and the condition of the patient improved.Quality engineering will continue to monitor complaints of this nature for potential emerging trends.Pma/510(k)#: p100022 and s001.The ziv6-35-125-6.0-120-ptx stent of lot number c778568 was implanted in the patient therefore is not available for evaluation.With the information provided a document based investigation was carried out.It was confirmed that images would not be available and no further information will be provided to support the complaint investigation.Available information stated that the patient had pre-existing conditions including: hypertension, hypercholesterolemia and was a smoker.According to complaint information provided, worsened claudication was observed on the patient.It can be noted that this symptom indicates progression of peripheral artery disease and can also be associated with the restenosis process.Restenosis is a common adverse event of endovascular procedures and can be caused by injury to the vessel (e.G.During pta and/or stenting).Vessel injury provokes an inflammatory response that leads to (or amplifies) the restenosis process.It may be noted that surface of the zilver ptx stent is coated with the drug (paclitaxel) to help prevent subsequent restenosis of the artery.It can be therefore stated that it is very unlikely that the reported restenosis could have occurred due to zilver ptx malfunction; however a definitive cause of this event cannot be determined.Due to limited information and lack of imaging no other comments can be made.As no imaging was available to support the complaint investigation, the complaint is confirmed based on customer testimony.It may be noted that worsened claudication and restenosis of the stented artery are known potential adverse events associated with placement of this device.Prior to distribution all zilver ptx devices are subject to visual inspection and functional checks to ensure device integrity.A review of the relevant manufacturing records revealed no discrepancies that could have contributed to this complaint.According to information provided pta and stent placement were preformed against restenosis and the condition of the patient improved.Quality engineering will continue to monitor complaints of this nature for potential emerging trends.
 
Event Description
Two ziv6-35-125-6.0-120-ptx devices were placed in the left sfa of a (b)(6) male patient.On (b)(6) 2015: 50-99% restenosis of the lesion was confirmed.Worsened claudication was observed on the patient.Pta and stent placement (zilver ptx, details unknown) were performed against restenosis and the condition of the patient recovered.As per the above description of event received, two devices are involved in this incident.This report addresses the investigation of 1 x ziv6-35-125-6.0-100-ptx device of lot# c778568.An additional report will be submitted in relation to the other device reported- report reference number: 3001845648-2015-00170.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Pma/510(k)#: p100022 and s001.The ziv6-35-125-6.0-120-ptx stent of lot number c776874 was implanted in the patient therefore is not available for evaluation.With the information provided a document based investigation was carried out.It was confirmed that images would not be available and no further information will be provided to support the complaint investigation.Available information stated that the patient had pre-existing conditions including: hypertension, hypercholesterolemia diabetes type ii and was history of tobacco use.According to complaint information provided, worsened claudication was observed on the patient.It can be noted that this symptom indicates progression of peripheral artery disease and can also be associated with the restenosis process.Restenosis is a common adverse event of endovascular procedures and can be caused by injury to the vessel (e.G.During pta and/or stenting).Vessel injury provokes an inflammatory response that leads to (or amplifies) the restenosis process.It may be noted that surface of the zilver ptx stent is coated with the drug (paclitaxel) to help prevent subsequent restenosis of the artery.It can be therefore stated that it is very unlikely that the reported restenosis could have occurred due to zilver ptx malfunction; however a definitive cause of this event cannot be determined.Due to limited information and lack of imaging no other comments can be made.As no imaging was available to support the complaint investigation, the complaint is confirmed based on customer testimony.It may be noted that worsened claudication and restenosis of the stented artery are known potential adverse events associated with placement of this device.Prior to distribution all zilver ptx devices are subject to visual inspection and functional checks to ensure device integrity.A review of the relevant manufacturing records revealed no discrepancies that could have contributed to this complaint.According to information provided pta and stent placement were preformed against restenosis and the condition of the patient improved.Quality engineering will continue to monitor complaints of this nature for potential emerging trends.
 
Event Description
This follow up report is being submitted due to the receipt of additional information.Information was received that changed the following details: product lot # product identifier, description, patient¿s information (age, gender, pre existing condition, implant date).Updated description: on (b)(6) 2012: two stents were placed in the left sfa of a (b)(6) female patient.Ziv6-35-125-6.0-120-ptx (c776874), ziv6-35-125-7.0-40-ptx (c772912).On (b)(6) 2015: 50-99% restenosis of the lesion was confirmed.Worsened claudication was observed on the patient.Pta and stent placement (zilver ptx, details unknown) were performed against restenosis and the condition of the patient recovered.Reference also related report # 3001845648-2015-00170.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ZILVER PTX DRUG-ELUTING PERIPHERAL STENT
Type of Device
NIU STENT, SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY, DRUG-ELUTING
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK IRELAND LTD
o halloran road
limerick
EI 
Manufacturer Contact
sinead quaid
o'halloran road
national technology park
limerick 
EI  
061334440
MDR Report Key5073637
MDR Text Key25614681
Report Number3001845648-2015-00169
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIU
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
P100022
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Followup
Report Date 11/02/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/14/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberZIV6-35-125-6.0-120-PTX
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Distributor Facility Aware Date08/12/2015
Event Location Hospital
Date Manufacturer Received11/02/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured06/14/2012
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age69 YR
-
-