• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ZOLL MANUFACTURING CORPORATION LIFEVEST WCD 4000 SYSTEM; WEARABLE CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ZOLL MANUFACTURING CORPORATION LIFEVEST WCD 4000 SYSTEM; WEARABLE CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATOR Back to Search Results
Model Number WCD 4000
Device Problems Signal Artifact/Noise (1036); Inappropriate/Inadequate Shock/Stimulation (1574)
Patient Problems Dizziness (2194); Shock from Patient Lead(s) (3162)
Event Date 08/20/2015
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
There was no death or device malfunction associated with the inappropriate defibrillation event.Device evaluation summary: the monitor sn (b)(4) and belt sn (b)(4) were returned and evaluated at the distributor, in accordance with procedures recommended by zoll manufacturing corporation.The evaluation included review of downloaded software flag files (attached) on the day of the event and incoming functional testing.The review of the software flags consisted of an analysis of the downloaded data to identify any fault flags or unusual patterns of software flags.The software flag files did not suggest a device malfunction that would contribute to the inappropriate treatment.During the incoming functional testing, a 1hz simulated normal sinus rhythm signal was applied to the ecg electrodes, followed by a 5hz simulated treatable arrhythmia signal which verified proper performance of the detection algorithm.During the transition to the 5hz signal, the device was confirmed to properly enter into a treatment sequence which includes a verification of the tactile vibration alarm, audio messaging, and siren alarms, as well as a test of the pulse delivery circuitry.The pulse delivery circuitry test verified proper charging of the high voltage capacitors and proper delivery of five full energy 150j biphasic pulses.The functional testing confirmed proper response button functionality, ecg acquisition, detection algorithm performance, and pulse delivery functionality.Device manufacture date: monitor: 07/05/2012; electrode belt: 10/29/2013.The investigation into the event concludes that there was no device malfunction.A cause and effect analysis was conducted (attached) using all of the available information which includes the incident report, device evaluation, software flag files, and ecg strips (attached).The primary cause of the inappropriate shock events was lack of response button use by the patient during the false detections, prior to shock delivery.The ecg analysis, conducted by trained ecg technicians, identified the primary cause of the false detections was ecg motion artifact.The source of the motion artifact could not be positively identified through the cause and effect analysis.The following factors could not be ruled out as contributing causes of the motion artifact: body motion poor ecg contact with skin inappropriate defibrillations are an anticipated risk associated with the use of the lifevest.Patients are instructed through alarms, voice messages, ifu, and training to press the response buttons to prevent an inappropriate defibrillation.The current commercial inappropriate defibrillation rate is consistent with the observed rate during the (b)(6) clinical trial (b)(4).A summary of the safety and effectiveness data (ssed), including the inappropriate defibrillation safety objective supporting fda's approval of the lifevest, can be found at (pdf).The lifevest detection algorithm complies with iec 60601-2-4 performance requirements for sensitivity and specificity.
 
Event Description
A us distributor contacted zoll on (b)(6) 2015 to report that a patient experienced an inappropriate defibrillation event consisting of four inappropriate treatments between 08:08:31 and 09:37:23 on (b)(6) 2015.Motion artifact contributed to the false detections.It was reported that the patient was conscious at the time of the event, but felt dizzy before the event.The response buttons were pressed after the second defibrillation was delivered, but not immediately prior to any of the defibrillations.The patient went to the hospital for further evaluation.The patient continued use of the lifevest.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LIFEVEST WCD 4000 SYSTEM
Type of Device
WEARABLE CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
ZOLL MANUFACTURING CORPORATION
121 gamma drive
pittsburgh PA 15238 3495
Manufacturer (Section G)
ZOLL MANUFACTURING CORPORATION
121 gamma drive
pittsburgh PA 15238 3495
Manufacturer Contact
allison petzold
121 gamma drive
pittsburgh, PA 15238-3495
4129683333
MDR Report Key5081143
MDR Text Key25991438
Report Number3008642652-2015-05597
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MVK
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
P010030
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type distributor
Report Date 09/14/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/16/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Model NumberWCD 4000
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Manufacturer Received08/20/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured07/05/2012
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Other;
Patient Age79 YR
-
-