• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BARD SDN. BHD. -8040607 INLAY URETERAL STENT WITH GUIDEWIRE; STENT SET

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BARD SDN. BHD. -8040607 INLAY URETERAL STENT WITH GUIDEWIRE; STENT SET Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 889624
Device Problem Peeled/Delaminated (1454)
Patient Problem Foreign Body In Patient (2687)
Event Date 08/06/2015
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The investigation is still in progress.Once the investigation is complete, a supplemental report will be filed.The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.
 
Event Description
It was reported that when replacing the stent, the coating jacket of the guide wire shaft peeled off in approximate 8.5 cm length, between the approx.11 and 19.5 cm from the distal end.The doctor was not certain whether the peeling portion was tangled with the outer wire, or remained in the patient's body.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Received one guidewire only.The sample was visually evaluated and it was observed that the coating of the guidewire had peeled off longitudinally, approximately 11cm to 19.5cm from the distal end of the guidewire.The complaint was confirmed with an unknown root cause, however, the supplier of the guidewire has been made aware of the reported issue.The lot number is unknown therefore the device history record could not be reviewed.The instructions for use state the following: "do not use the product if any abnormalities occur during use.Immediately stop use and take appropriate steps." (b)(4).The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.
 
Event Description
Per additional information received, it was reported that the guidewire and urological catheter was inserted into the right renal pelvis.After the guidewire was inserted, a rigid endoscope was inserted over the guidewire.Once the replacement procedure was completed, the doctor noted that the jacket of the guidewire was damaged.The doctor alleged that the jacket had possibly been damaged when the endoscope was inserted.During the next scheduled stent replacement procedure the doctor will perform a cystoscopy to check if there are pieces of the guidewire that was left in the patient's body.The doctor did not attempt to flush out the coating during the procedure.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INLAY URETERAL STENT WITH GUIDEWIRE
Type of Device
STENT SET
Manufacturer (Section D)
BARD SDN. BHD. -8040607
kulim industrial estate
lot 57c
kulim, kedah 09000
MY  09000
Manufacturer (Section G)
BARD SDN. BHD. -8040607
kulim industrial estate
lot 57c
kulim, kedah 09000
MY   09000
Manufacturer Contact
janna parks
8195 industrial blvd
covington, GA 30014
7707846100
MDR Report Key5087154
MDR Text Key26447656
Report Number1018233-2015-00352
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FAD
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K983498
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,other
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Followup
Report Date 10/30/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/18/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number889624
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer09/07/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received10/30/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-