• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SYNTHES USA; POLYMETHYLMETHACRYLATE BONE CEMENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SYNTHES USA; POLYMETHYLMETHACRYLATE BONE CEMENT Back to Search Results
Device Problem Leak/Splash (1354)
Patient Problems Failure of Implant (1924); No Code Available (3191)
Event Date 02/03/2012
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.This report is for unknown pmma cement (traumacem v+, synthes)/unknown quantity/unknown lot.(b)(4).The investigation could not be completed and no conclusion could be drawn, as no device was returned and no lot number or part number was provided.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Event Description
This report is being filed after the subsequent review of the following literature article; krappinger d, kastenberger t.J, schmid.R (2012) using augmented instrumentation for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral body fractures.Oper orthop traumatol 2012, 24: 4-12.The purpose of this study was repositioning and stabilization of osteoporotic vertebral body fractures using short-segment dorsal instrumentation, improvement of the screw purchase in osteoporotic bone by using cement augmentation of the pedicle screws to prevent postoperative correction loss and quick postoperative mobilization that is practically painless, without requiring external bracing.Between july 2008 and december 2009, 10 patients with osteoporotic vertebral body fractures of the cervical and lumbar spine were treated with cement-augmented instrumentation.The average age was 65.8 years (35-94 years).Type a injuries were involved in 6 cases (a1: 2 cases, a3: 4 cases) and type b injuries in 4 cases (b1: 1 case, b2: 1 case, b3: 2 cases).Pedicle screw system (uss ii, synthes) without central perforation in the screws or with perforated screws were used for instrumentation.Pmma cement was used for the cement augmentation (traumacem v, synthes or competitor's biomaterial).This report refers to the following complications: revision surgery due to loosened or severed pedicle screw and cement leakage in a (b)(6) female.The patient presented with post-traumatic kyphosis after a type a fracture of the 11th cervical vertebral body.Intraoperative image after corrective positioning of th9-th12 via dorsal instrumentation showed favorable alignment.Only the screws in the 9th cervical vertebral body needed to be augmented due to poor intraoperative screw purchase.Postoperatively loss of correction was reported due to the non-augmented pedicle screws severed by the 12th cervical vertebral body.Lengthening of the instrumentation, augmentation of the caudal pedicle screws and additional ventral support was performed during the revision surgery.Post-operatively cement penetration was reported in the paravertebral veins.This is report 4 of 6 for (b)(4).This report is for an unknown pmma cement (traumacem v+, synthes).A copy of the literature article is being submitted with this medwatch.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Type of Device
POLYMETHYLMETHACRYLATE BONE CEMENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
SYNTHES USA
1302 wrights lane east
west chester PA 19380
Manufacturer Contact
linda plews
1302 wrights lane east
west chester, PA 19380
6107195000
MDR Report Key5090525
MDR Text Key26270508
Report Number2520274-2015-15867
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NDN
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Pharmacist
Report Date 09/08/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/21/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received09/08/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age55 YR
-
-