The customer stated via email that they received the following complaint from end user, "surgeon, dra.(b)(6), reported that during a recent surgery the curette got broken, which means that took two more hours looking for the head of the curette.Besides, the interlaminar implant couldn't be placed because was necessary to remove the spinous process to find the head of the curette, leaving out the possibility of placing the implant." additional information received 17 sep 2015: the customer reported, the event required additional radiation exposure to find the head of the curette.There were extra shots with the arm in c position, for both the procedure and for locating and removing the fragment.It became necessary to remove and extract the spine apophysis, since the fragment was shifted after this and was very difficult to access due to the limited space.It was required to perform a laminectomy which was not scheduled to find the head of the curette.The patient in the immediate postoperative period did not have any alteration.Was not possible the arthrodesis due to lack of spine apophysis.There was also damage in the spinal canal (rupture) due to several attempts to extract the head, plus surgery took more than two hours.The procedure was a decompression of spinal canal due to stenosis.Microdiscoidectomia + + posterior fusion with laminectomy with coflex bisegmental.The plan was two coflex in two levels, but only one in the other space was necessary to remove the spinous process and that prevented to place the second implant.It has not yet been evaluated in outpatient.The patient hasn't been in follow up control, we will inform the current state.
|
(b)(4): one u-0166 curette c-l angld gold cs#2-0 10in was reported as breaking at the tip during a surgery procedure.The sample reported was not returned, evaluations and a thorough investigation follow-up could not be performed.No specific information was given on how the curette tip possibly broke off.Root cause could not be determined due to no sample returned.Customer did not communicate the lot code of the sample, hence a dhr review could not be performed.Personnel awareness was performed on the customer complaint description with the aid of the current print and work instructions.
|