• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SYNTHES USA; NAIL, FIXATION, BONE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SYNTHES USA; NAIL, FIXATION, BONE Back to Search Results
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Bone Fracture(s) (1870); Hematoma (1884); Pain (1994)
Event Date 10/31/2014
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.This report is for proximal femoral nails, unknown quantity, unknown lot.The investigation could not be completed and no conclusion could be drawn, as no device was returned and no lot number or pert number was provided.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Event Description
This report is being filed after the subsequent review of the following literature article, zehir s., et al.(2015).Proximal femoral nail antirotation against dynamic hip screw for unstable trochanteric fractures; a prospective randomized comparison.Eur j trauma emerg surg, 41:393-400.This study sought to determine whether intramedullary fixation with proximal femoral nail antirotation produces comparable outcomes to dynamic hip screw in the treatment of unstable trochanteric fractures.Patients were randomly allocated to receive proximal femoral nail antirotation (group 1) or dynamic hip screw (group 2).Patients were randomly allocated to receive pfna (synthes-(b)(4)) (group 1, n = 96, mean age; 77.22 +/- 6.82 years, male:female ratio 0.62) or dhs (synthes-(b)(4)) (group 2, n = 102, mean age; 76.86 +/- 6.74, male:female ratio 0.62) for operative treatment of the fracture.The study was conducted in a (b)(6) hospital and the study group comprised patients who were operated on for unstable trochanteric fractures between january 2010 and march 2013.In-hospital mortality occurred in eight patients who were aged between 72 and 91 years.Six of these deaths were due to cardiac failure and two due to sepsis and multiorgan failure.The following complications were noted in dhs group: deep wound infection(4), hematoma(4), cutout(8), pain at hip(3), pain at thigh(2), reoperation(3).Three patients in the dhs group underwent hip arthroplasty for severe cutout and loss of reduction.The following complications were noted in pfna group: hematoma(2), cutout(7), screw migration(5), pain at hip(3), pain at thigh(7).Six patients (three in the pfna group and three in the dhs group, p = 0.94) had new trochanteric fractures and two (one in the pfna group and one in the dhs group) had new femoral shaft fractures until the 6-month follow-up.This is report 3 of 5 for (b)(4).This report is for proximal femoral nails and refers to the serious injuries of hematoma, pain at hip, pain at thigh, new trochanteric fractures, and a new femoral shaft fracture.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Type of Device
NAIL, FIXATION, BONE
Manufacturer (Section D)
SYNTHES USA
1302 wrights lane east
west chester PA 19380
Manufacturer Contact
linda plews
1302 wrights lane east
west chester, PA 19380
6107195000
MDR Report Key5094682
MDR Text Key26468357
Report Number2520274-2015-16033
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code JDS
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Report Date 09/04/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/22/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received09/04/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-