• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC CRYOCATH LP ARCTIC FRONT ADVANCE CARDIAC CRYOABLATION CATHETER; PERCUTANEOUS CATHETER INTENDED FOR TREATMENT OF ATRIAL FIBRILLATION

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC CRYOCATH LP ARCTIC FRONT ADVANCE CARDIAC CRYOABLATION CATHETER; PERCUTANEOUS CATHETER INTENDED FOR TREATMENT OF ATRIAL FIBRILLATION Back to Search Results
Model Number 2AF284
Device Problem Insufficient Information (3190)
Patient Problem Nerve Damage (1979)
Event Date 08/01/2015
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic cryocath was made aware of this event through a search of literature publications.It was not possible to ascertain specific device information from the literature publication or to match the event with previously reported events.This information is based entirely on journal literature.All information provided is included in this report.Patient information is limited due to confidentiality concerns.The baseline gender/age is male/63 years old.Without a lot number or device serial number, the manufacturing date cannot be determined.Since no device id was provided, it is unknown if this event has been previously reported.Referenced article: acute and long-term outcomes of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation using the second-generation cryoballoon versus open-irrigated radiofrequency: a multicenter experience.Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.2015;26(8):832-839.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
Aryana amsmdf, bowers mr, o'neill pg, et al.Acute and long-term outcomes of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation using the seco nd-generation cryoballoon versus open-irrigated radiofrequency: a multicenter experience.Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.2015;26(8):832-839.Second-generation cryoballoon versus rf introduction there are limited comparative data on catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (caaf) using the second-generation cryoballoon (cb-2) versus point-by-point radiofrequency (rf).This study examines the acute/long-term caaf outcomes using these 2 strategies.Methods and results in this multicenter, retrospective, nonrandomized analysis, procedural and clinical outcomes of 1,196 patients (76% with paroxysmal af) undergoing caaf using cb-2 (n = 773) and open-irrigated, non-force sensing rf (n = 423) were evaluated.Pulmonary vein isolation was achieved in 98% with cb-2 and 99% with rf (p = 0.168).Cb-2 was associated with shorter ablation time (40± 14 min vs.66 ± 26 min; p <(><<)> 0.001) and procedure time (145 ± 49 minutes vs.188 ± 42 minutes; p <(><<)> 0.001), but greater fluoroscopic utilization (29 ± 13 minutes vs.23 ± 14 minutes; p <(><<)> 0.001).While transient (7.6% vs.0%; p <(><<)> 0.001) and persistent (1.2% vs.0%; p = 0.026) phrenic nerve palsy occurred exclusively with cb-2, other adverse event rates were similar between cb-2 (1.6%) and rf (2.6%); p = 0.207.However, freedom from af/atrial flutter/tachycardia at 12 months following a single procedure without antiarrhythmic therapy was greater with cb-2 (76.6%) versus rf (60.4%); p <(><<)> 0.001.While this difference was evident in patients with paroxysmal af (p <(><<)> 0.001), it did not reach significance in those with persistent af (p = 0.089).Additionally, cb-2 was associated with reduced long-term need for antiarrhythmic therapy (16.7% vs.22.0%; p = 0.024) and repeat ablations (14.6% vs.24.1%; p <(><<)> 0.001).Conclusion in this multicenter, retrospective, nonrandomized study, caaf using cb-2 coupled with rf as occasionally required was associated with greater freedom from atrial arrhythmias at 12 months following a single procedure without antiarrhythmic therapy when compared to open-irrigated, non-force sensing rf, alone.The literature publication reports the following patient complications: gastroparesis.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ARCTIC FRONT ADVANCE CARDIAC CRYOABLATION CATHETER
Type of Device
PERCUTANEOUS CATHETER INTENDED FOR TREATMENT OF ATRIAL FIBRILLATION
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC CRYOCATH LP
16771 chemin ste-marie
kirkland H9H 5 H3
CA  H9H 5H3
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC CARDIAC RHYTHM HEART FAILURE
8200 coral sea st ne
mounds view MN 55112
Manufacturer Contact
anne schilling
8200 coral sea st ne
mounds view, MN 55112
7635052036
MDR Report Key5095729
MDR Text Key26478722
Report Number3002648230-2015-00307
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OAE
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P100010/S015
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional,literatur
Reporter Occupation Physician
Report Date 09/08/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/22/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number2AF284
Device Catalogue Number2AF284
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received09/08/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age00063 YR
-
-