|
Model Number 8637-20 |
Device Problem
Application Program Problem (2880)
|
Patient Problem
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
Event Date 02/10/2014 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Concomitant products: product id 8835, serial # (b)(4), product type programmer, patient; product id 8709sc, serial # (b)(4), implanted: (b)(6) 2013, product type catheter.(b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported the personal therapy manager (ptm) was not registering the same dose as what the doctor¿s office was registering by about half a milligram (mg).It was noted the ptm was not saying the same daily dose as what the pump was supposed to be and her "continuous dose was 4.391 and they are showing 4.999 or 4.491 something like that.My bolus dose it was 8.Something but now we just lowered it." it was reported this issue began about a month ago.It was also reported the refill date on the ptm was going back and forth and she had up to six ¿activations¿ a day and if she used on the date will change.It was noted the ptm said one alarm date and when they withdrew the morphine she had 7-8 mg left and it¿s not matching up.The pump was being used to deliver morphine.It was later reported that the patient saw codes ¿8419¿ and ¿8476¿ on the ptm on (b)(6) 2014 but did not know when the motor stall occurred.The reporter stated that this was occurring a couple times a day.It was unknown if the patient was hearing a pump alarm or had magnetic resonance imaging (mri) but the reporter did not think the patient had recently had an mri.The event logs were accessed and reviewed with no motor stalls in the logs back to (b)(6) 2014.The patient had also stated that the ptm was not working at all and would not turn on despite new batteries being utilized.The reporter changed the batteries and the ptm worked fine but the patient was convinced it was not working and needed anew one along with a new pump and catheter.Additional information was received and it was reported that telemetry taken on (b)(6) 2014 had no indication of a motor stall.The patient had continuously experienced trouble with her ptm (personal therapy manager); however, on (b)(6) 2014, it was working appropriately.The logs did show 3 instances where the pa (patient activated) logs indicated a successful pa request (indicated by an 88) followed by an unsuccessful pa request (indicated by an 89) for the same timeframe on (b)(6) 2014.Additional information was received and it was reported that it was never confirmed that a motor stall ever occurred; the logs did not indicate a motor stall occurred.A new ptm (personal therapy manager) was being requested by the hcp (healthcare provider).Additional information received reported that the patient was convinced something was wrong with the ptm, even though it turned on just fine after new batteries were put into it.Patient did not keep the ptm.Additional information later reported the patient¿s ptm does not give the patient all their boluses.Anytime the patient would attempt a bolus the ptm would shut off.The patient gave the ptm for repair.The patient still did not have it back or heard back.The patient wrote a formal letter of complaint about a month or 2 ago.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|