Evaluation revealed the tibial comp, single coated us version, large, the revision sliding core 14 mm and the talar comp, single coated us vers medium, right to be the subject products.No further associated products were reported.Deficiency in material or manufacturing was not found.The affected items were documented as faultless prior to distribution.Thus, we excluded deviations in material and manufacturing.The explanted polyethylene sliding core and both metal components showed normal traces of use (like slight scratches), but no signs of abrasion, damage or breakage.Progress notes from the follow up examination from september 01, 2015 stated that the fibula of the patient is fractured.Furthermore it indicated that ¿the tibial component is probably unstable¿ and that ¿her screw is broken in the lateral malleolus¿.Reasons for bone breakage can be various (e.G.But not limited to: week bones, fall, etc.).In this case the surgeon gave no further indication what may have caused the fracture of the fibula resulting in a potential instability of the tibial component.The attending physician decided to revise the patient.The star ankle implants were removed and replaced by in-bone.The reported information did not allege any deficiency in the identity, quality, reliability, safety, effectiveness or performance of the device.Potential device loosening was considered in the risk analysis.The risk of bone fracture is pointed out in the ifu.Based on the above information and referring to that no deviation was found during investigation, the event was not linked to a deficiency of the devices, but was rather patient related.In case relevant information becomes available we reserve the right to update the investigation and to change the root cause.
|