(b)(4).During processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.(b)(4).The device is expected to be returned for evaluation.It has not yet been received.A follow up report will be submitted with all relevant information.
|
It was reported that the procedure was to treat a de novo lesion with mild tortuosity, moderate calcification and 85% stenosis in the distal common carotid artery.When the acculink was unpacked, the stent was noted to be exposed outside of the sheath.Reportedly there was some resistance noted when removing the acculink from the packaging coil.The device was not used and was replaced with another acculink to complete the procedure.There was no patient involvement and no clinically significant delay in the procedure.No additional information was provided.
|
(b)(4).Evaluation summary: the device was returned for analysis.The premature deployment was confirmed.The resistance was unable to be confirmed.Based on visual and functional analysis of the returned device, there is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design, or labeling.A conclusive cause for the reported difficulties could not be determined.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no other incidents from this lot.Based on the reviewed information, there is no indication the issue was caused by, or related to the design, manufacture or labeling of the device.
|