Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.Additional narrative: patient weight was not provided by reporter.It is unknown if the complained device was implanted in the patient.It is unknown if the complaint device is expected for return to synthes for evaluation.(b)(6).Additional surgical intervention.The investigation could not be completed; no conclusion could be drawn, as no product was received.A device history record review has been requested.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
Additional narrative: device history records was conducted.The report indicates that the: manufacturing location: (b)(4), manufacturing date: 03.June 2015, expiry date: 01.May 2025, no anomalies were detected during device history record review.No ncrs were generated during production.Review of the device history record showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of the product that would contribute to this complaint condition.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|