• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC, INC. AORTIC AP; HEART-VALVE, MECHANICAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC, INC. AORTIC AP; HEART-VALVE, MECHANICAL Back to Search Results
Model Number 505
Device Problem Fracture (1260)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 09/14/2015
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Product analysis: the product has been returned and analysis is in progress.Conclusion: upon completion of analysis, a supplemental report will be submitted.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
Medtronic received information that during the implant of this mechanical valve, one of the valve leaflets broke off while the physician was adjusting the valve flow outlet and rotating the valve after the valve was sutured into place.The physician stated that too much force was used while rotating the valve leaflets.A medtronic mechanical valve of the same model was implanted successfully during the procedure.No adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Product analysis: upon receipt at medtronic¿s quality laboratory, the returned specimen was inspected.One leaflet appeared to be intact and in the closed position.This leaflet showed no evidence of damage such as cracks and/or surface anomalies.Overall, the valve appeared to be clean with no evidence of blood contact.Both inflow and outflow valve hinge mechanisms appeared intact.The inflow and outflow orifices appeared intact with no evidence of damage.Using a blue actuator to test leaflet movement, the remaining leaflet appeared to move without difficulty.The valve was rinsed under tap water and it was verified that the carbon subassembly rotated in the sewing ring.The sewing ring was removed by systematically undoing the stitching to expose the stiffening ring window.The lock wire was pulled out and the stiffening ring removed from the orifice.The serial number was verified.Conclusion: based on the analysis and the reported information, the leaflet fracture was due to excessive force while rotating the valve leaflets by the physician.This investigation revealed no intrinsic evidence to suggest a root cause related to manufacturing.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AORTIC AP
Type of Device
HEART-VALVE, MECHANICAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC, INC.
3800 annapolis lane
minneapolis MN 55447
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC STRUCTURAL HEART
8200 coral sea street ne
mounds view MN 55112
Manufacturer Contact
paula bixby
8200 coral sea street ne
mounds view, MN 55112
7635055378
MDR Report Key5135334
MDR Text Key27818339
Report Number3008592544-2015-00039
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LWQ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCH
PMA/PMN Number
P990046
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Followup,Followup
Report Date 01/15/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received10/08/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/11/2020
Device Model Number505
Device Catalogue Number505DA18
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer09/16/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received01/15/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/13/2013
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age00050 YR
-
-