Catalog Number 352.040 |
Device Problem
Break (1069)
|
Patient Problem
No Patient Involvement (2645)
|
Event Date 09/21/2015 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.Patient information was not provided by reporter.Event date: it was not reported when the subject device broke but the issue was discovered on (b)(6) 2015.Implant and explant dates: device is an instrument and is not implanted/explanted.A device history record review was performed for the subject device lot.The review showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of the product that would contribute to this complaint condition.No non-conformances were generated during the production of the subject device.The subject device has been received and is currently in the evaluation process.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Event Description
|
Device report from synthes (b)(4) reported an event in (b)(6) as follows: it was reported that during a surgical procedure it was discovered that the connector portion of the flexible shaft which attaches the device to the reamer head was broken.There was no report of surgical delay or patient harm.This report is 1 of 1 for (b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.Corrected data: evaluation codes corrected.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(6).Product investigation summary: the investigation has shown that one of the legs at the coupling is broken off and the shaft is badly bent.There are a lot of visible wear marks over the entirety of the article.The device history record was researched with no abnormal findings identified.There were no issues during the manufacturing of the product that would contribute to this complaint condition.Further investigation has shown that this instrument was manufactured in february, 2003.Due to the condition and the age of the instrument, it is likely that the complained malfunction is due to normal wear and tear following frequent use.No product fault could be detected.Device used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|