|
Model Number ESS305 |
Device Problems
Occlusion Within Device (1423); Material Perforation (2205)
|
Patient Problem
Complaint, Ill-Defined (2331)
|
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
This is a spontaneous case report received from a medical doctor in united states on 01-oct-2015 which refers to a female patient of unspecified age who had essure (fallopian tube occlusion insert) inserted.Hsg (hysterosalpingogram) confirmation test was performed - one insert had perforated the tube and tube was patent, contralateral side was occluded.Salpingectomy was performed for contraception and insert removal was successful.Follow-up information received on 05-oct-2015: the initial receipt date was confirmed.Follow-up received on 16-oct-2015: the ptc (product technical complaint) investigation result was provided.(b)(4).Final assessment: for cases where a device failure during insertion is reported, we conduct an investigation of any returned device.For cases where an insert is removed at a later time after insertion, we typically do not conduct an inspection of the insert.In this case, no product was returned.Since we have no valid lot number for this case, we were unable to conduct a review of the manufacturing batch record.We are unable to confirm any quality defect or device malfunction at this time.There was no event reported which indicates a new technical failure mode for the device.Medical assessment: no product quality defect was confirmed therefore a relationship to the reported medical events is excluded.The technical assessment concluded unconfirmed quality defect.Based on the available information, there is no relationship between the reported medical events and a quality defect.Company causality comment: this medically confirmed, spontaneous case report refers to a female patient who had essure (fallopian tube occlusion insert) inserted and it was reported that one insert had perforated the tube.A salpingectomy was performed for contraception and insert removal was successful.This event is serious due to its medical importance and listed in the reference safety information for essure.In this particular case, the exact date and mechanism of the reported event were not known, however given its nature and considering that fallopian tube perforation may occur with trans-cervical intrauterine procedure (e.G.Hysteroscopy, curettage) or most often during insertion, a causal relationship with essure therapy cannot be excluded.Since a surgical intervention was performed, this case was regarded as incident.The product technical analysis concluded that based on the available information, there is no relationship between the reported medical events and a quality defect.Further information is being sought.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Follow-up information received on 11-jan-2016: follow-up attempts were done with no response to date.Company causality comment: this medically confirmed, spontaneous case report refers to a female patient who had essure (fallopian tube occlusion insert) inserted and it was reported that one insert had perforated the tube.A salpingectomy was performed for contraception and insert removal was successful.This event is serious due to its medical importance and listed in the reference safety information for essure.In this particular case, the exact date and mechanism of the reported event were not known, however given its nature and considering that fallopian tube perforation may occur with trans-cervical intrauterine procedure (e.G.Hysteroscopy, curettage) or most often during insertion, a causal relationship with essure therapy cannot be excluded.Since a surgical intervention was performed, this case was regarded as incident.The product technical analysis concluded that based on the available information, there is no relationship between the reported medical events and a quality defect.Despite follow-up attempts, no further information was obtained.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Data correction for us reporting: the code knh was replaced with hhs.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|