• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BAYER PHARMA AG ESSURE; INSERT, TUBAL OCCLUSION

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BAYER PHARMA AG ESSURE; INSERT, TUBAL OCCLUSION Back to Search Results
Model Number ESS305
Device Problems Occlusion Within Device (1423); Material Perforation (2205)
Patient Problem Complaint, Ill-Defined (2331)
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
This is a spontaneous case report received from a medical doctor in united states on 01-oct-2015 which refers to a female patient of unspecified age who had essure (fallopian tube occlusion insert) inserted.Hsg (hysterosalpingogram) confirmation test was performed - one insert had perforated the tube and tube was patent, contralateral side was occluded.Salpingectomy was performed for contraception and insert removal was successful.Follow-up information received on 05-oct-2015: the initial receipt date was confirmed.Follow-up received on 16-oct-2015: the ptc (product technical complaint) investigation result was provided.(b)(4).Final assessment: for cases where a device failure during insertion is reported, we conduct an investigation of any returned device.For cases where an insert is removed at a later time after insertion, we typically do not conduct an inspection of the insert.In this case, no product was returned.Since we have no valid lot number for this case, we were unable to conduct a review of the manufacturing batch record.We are unable to confirm any quality defect or device malfunction at this time.There was no event reported which indicates a new technical failure mode for the device.Medical assessment: no product quality defect was confirmed therefore a relationship to the reported medical events is excluded.The technical assessment concluded unconfirmed quality defect.Based on the available information, there is no relationship between the reported medical events and a quality defect.Company causality comment: this medically confirmed, spontaneous case report refers to a female patient who had essure (fallopian tube occlusion insert) inserted and it was reported that one insert had perforated the tube.A salpingectomy was performed for contraception and insert removal was successful.This event is serious due to its medical importance and listed in the reference safety information for essure.In this particular case, the exact date and mechanism of the reported event were not known, however given its nature and considering that fallopian tube perforation may occur with trans-cervical intrauterine procedure (e.G.Hysteroscopy, curettage) or most often during insertion, a causal relationship with essure therapy cannot be excluded.Since a surgical intervention was performed, this case was regarded as incident.The product technical analysis concluded that based on the available information, there is no relationship between the reported medical events and a quality defect.Further information is being sought.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Follow-up information received on 11-jan-2016: follow-up attempts were done with no response to date.Company causality comment: this medically confirmed, spontaneous case report refers to a female patient who had essure (fallopian tube occlusion insert) inserted and it was reported that one insert had perforated the tube.A salpingectomy was performed for contraception and insert removal was successful.This event is serious due to its medical importance and listed in the reference safety information for essure.In this particular case, the exact date and mechanism of the reported event were not known, however given its nature and considering that fallopian tube perforation may occur with trans-cervical intrauterine procedure (e.G.Hysteroscopy, curettage) or most often during insertion, a causal relationship with essure therapy cannot be excluded.Since a surgical intervention was performed, this case was regarded as incident.The product technical analysis concluded that based on the available information, there is no relationship between the reported medical events and a quality defect.Despite follow-up attempts, no further information was obtained.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Data correction for us reporting: the code knh was replaced with hhs.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ESSURE
Type of Device
INSERT, TUBAL OCCLUSION
Manufacturer (Section D)
BAYER PHARMA AG
müllerstr. 178
berlin, CA 13353
GM  13353
Manufacturer (Section G)
BAYER PHARMA AG
müllerstr. 178
berlin, CA 13353
GM   13353
Manufacturer Contact
k shaw lamberson
100 bayer blvd.
p.o. box 915
whippany, NJ 07981-0915
MDR Report Key5180535
MDR Text Key29379956
Report Number2951250-2015-01255
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HHS
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P020014
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional,other
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 01/23/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberESS305
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 10/01/2015
Initial Date FDA Received10/27/2015
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Not provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received02/08/2016
01/23/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other; Required Intervention;
-
-