• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BECKMAN COULTER, INC. IRIS ICHEM VELOCITY; DIAZONIUM COLORIMETRY, UROBILINOGEN (URINARY, NON-QUANT.)

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BECKMAN COULTER, INC. IRIS ICHEM VELOCITY; DIAZONIUM COLORIMETRY, UROBILINOGEN (URINARY, NON-QUANT.) Back to Search Results
Device Problem Incorrect Or Inadequate Test Results (2456)
Patient Problem Complaint, Ill-Defined (2331)
Event Date 09/25/2015
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
Incorrect results were reported by the iris ichem velocity instrument.The results were discovered when quality control (qc) was performed on the instrument.All patient results were rechecked back until the previous qc run.19 patients' results were found to be incorrect.Corrections were made and physicians were notified.There was no treatment based on the incorrect results.The iris field service rep is scheduled to come in on monday morning to investigate and repair the instrument.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
IRIS ICHEM VELOCITY
Type of Device
DIAZONIUM COLORIMETRY, UROBILINOGEN (URINARY, NON-QUANT.)
Manufacturer (Section D)
BECKMAN COULTER, INC.
2470 faraday ave
carlsbad CA 92010
MDR Report Key5187487
MDR Text Key29811194
Report Number5187487
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KQO
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source User Facility
Reporter Occupation Patient
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 09/28/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Other
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA09/28/2015
Event Location Hospital
Date Report to Manufacturer09/28/2015
Initial Date Manufacturer Received Not provided
Initial Date FDA Received10/29/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage N
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-