Catalog Number 08.501.001.01S |
Device Problem
Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
|
Patient Problem
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
Event Date 10/09/2015 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.The subject device was not implanted in the patient due to the reported issue.A device history record review was performed for the subject device lot.The review showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of the product that would contribute to this complaint condition.No non-conformances were generated during the production of the subject device.The subject device has been received and is currently in the evaluation process.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported while using a zipfix during a coronary artery bypass graft surgery that the toothed surface of the zipfix band would not engage its locking head and therefore would not tighten, allowing it to slip back and forth.There was a five minute delay another zip fix was readily available.The procedure was completed successfully.This report is 1 of 1 for (b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Product investigation evaluation: one device with lot number 9463229 was returned for this complaint.Based on the findings documented in the non-manufacturing evaluation, it can be concluded that the device¿s needles were incorrectly removed (twisted) in the area of the bending feature, by the user.This action increased the device cross sectional area.While inserting the ¿device end¿ into the ¿locking head,¿ the locking feature teeth were deformed and the locking feature itself was pushed past its flexible state.The device locking, per the design intent, was therefore compromised.In summary, the root cause of the device failures is user handling related.Device used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Additional narrative: (b)(4).Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|