• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MAQUET CRITICAL CARE AB SERVO-I; VENTILATOR, CONTINUOUS, FACILITY USE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MAQUET CRITICAL CARE AB SERVO-I; VENTILATOR, CONTINUOUS, FACILITY USE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 6487800
Device Problem Human-Device Interface Problem (2949)
Patient Problems Low Oxygen Saturation (2477); Decreased Respiratory Rate (2485); Diminished Pulse Pressure (2606)
Event Date 07/13/2015
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Further information regarding the event has been sought.A supplemental medwatch report will be submitted when the investigation is completed.
 
Event Description
A facility medsun medwatch report was received that stated that: during the admission process the patient was connected to the bedside ventilator by the rt (respiratory therapist).The ventilator settings were confirmed but not accepted, and the ventilator remained in standby mode.Several minutes later, the patient blood pressure dropped unexpectedly, followed by a drop in heart rate (to 30 bpm), and declining oxygen saturation.Nursing adjusted inotrope and vasopressor infusions.While titrating iv drips.The rn (registered nurse) noticed the standby message on the ventilator screen and noted that the patient was not being ventilated, at which point she turned on the ventilator.The patient quickly responded to ventilation and medications, and was successfully intubated later that afternoon.The final patient outcome was no injury.(b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional information that was received from the hospital stated, the therapist entered the ventilator parameters and left it in the standby mode.The nursing staff was performing an ekg so the monitor was covered, and as a result, the desaturation was not picked up immediately.It was unknown how long the ventilator was in the standby mode.The ventilator was not pulled out of service.On discovery, ventilation was simply started whereas, the ventilator functioned normally and the patient¿s saturation values rose and returned to normal.The hospital raised 3 issues in regards to the ventilator system with software version 6.0: the claim of insensitivity of the screen cannot be confirmed.The standby screen can be partly covered as reported but, only when another window is opened.This action is operator-initiated and has to be completed or cancelled.As soon as completion is done by accepting or, the action is cancelled, the standby window is bare and clearly visible.The blinking standby red text in software version 7.0 with a black background clearly breaks the monotony that was raised by the hospital.It alerts the user that the patient is not ventilated.Our conclusion is that there was no ventilator malfunction at the time.The ventilator was left in the standby mode.This was the root cause for the event.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
(b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SERVO-I
Type of Device
VENTILATOR, CONTINUOUS, FACILITY USE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MAQUET CRITICAL CARE AB
solna
SW 
Manufacturer (Section G)
MAGNUS LINDQVIST
maquet critical care ab
röntgenvägen 2, se-171 54
solna
SW  
Manufacturer Contact
maquet critical care ab
röntgenvägen 2, se-171 54
solna 
MDR Report Key5191940
MDR Text Key29972002
Report Number8010042-2015-01052
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code CBK
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K123149
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type other
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/29/2015,10/05/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number6487800
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA10/29/2015
Distributor Facility Aware Date10/05/2015
Device Age YR
Event Location Hospital
Date Report to Manufacturer10/05/2015
Initial Date Manufacturer Received Not provided
Initial Date FDA Received10/30/2015
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received06/01/2016
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage N
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age71 YR
-
-