Catalog Number 03.402.224 |
Device Problem
Break (1069)
|
Patient Problem
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
Event Date 10/15/2015 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.Device is an instrument and is not implanted/explanted.A device history record review was performed for the subject device lot.The review showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of the product that would contribute to this complaint condition.No non-conformances were generated during the production of the subject device.A product development investigation was performed for the subject device.The subject device was returned with cosmetic scratches and wear evident across most surfaces.The connecting screw is broken into two pieces and was returned with the trial head.Although the exact cause for the complaint condition could not be determined, it is likely the result of excessive tightening and wear.A visual inspection and drawing review were performed as part of this investigation.No product design issues or discrepancies were observed.The design is adequate for its intended use when used and maintained as recommended, it did not contribute to the complaint condition.This complaint is confirmed.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that a radial trial head connecting screw broke during a radial head arthroplasty to repair a radial head fracture and dislocation.The surgeon experienced difficulty with surrounding soft tissue in getting the trial head into the trial stem.As the surgeon pushed down forcibly on the screwdriver, the trial head connecting screw broke.There was a reported 3-5 minute surgical delay.Both pieces of the screw were removed and the trial head slid back onto the trial stem successfully.There were no reported fragments left in the patient.The procedure was then completed without further incident.This report is 1 of 1 for (b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.Report sent to fda on or aroung the month of december 2015, unknown exact date.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Event Description
|
Complaint handling unit received a maude report forwarded from facility for med watch #(b)(4).Only additional and/or corrected information will be contained in this report.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|