• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: STELLARTECH RESEARCH CORPORATION MAESTRO 4000¿ CONTROLLER; CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS, CARDIAC ABLATION, FOR TREATMENT OF ATRIAL FLUTTER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

STELLARTECH RESEARCH CORPORATION MAESTRO 4000¿ CONTROLLER; CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS, CARDIAC ABLATION, FOR TREATMENT OF ATRIAL FLUTTER Back to Search Results
Model Number M00440000
Device Problem Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 10/09/2015
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Device evaluated by mfr: it is indicated that the device will not be returned for evaluation.A review of the batch history, historical trending, and similar complaint trending review for the product family will be conducted.If there is any further relevant information from that review, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported that rf delivery did not stop.During a procedure, a maestro 4000 controller was used, however, radiofrequency delivery did not stop when the physician stopped pushing the footswitch.The procedure was completed with this device.No patient complications reported and the patient's condition is good.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device evaluated by mfr: the device was received for analysis.Examination of the returned device revealed that the foot switch was received back in over all good physical condition.Pedal presses down evenly with normal clicking sound.Connector and pins were found clean and aligned properly.Cable jacket in good physical shape.The foot switch was functionally tested by connecting an ohm meter between the hot pin and the outer return shield.The switch was activated and released several times.Each time it was activated the circuit closed and triggered the ohm meter.The cable was pulled and twisted in several ways to test for breaks in the internal wiring.None were found.The footswitch passed all testing.The manufacturing batch record review confirmed that the device met all material, assembly and performance specifications.The root cause is not confirmed as there was no evidence of the alleged issue or any anomalies which could have contributed to the reported difficulty.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported that rf delivery did not stop.During a procedure, a maestro 4000¿ controller was used, however, radiofrequency delivery did not stop when the physician stopped pushing the footswitch.The procedure was completed with this device.No patient complications reported and the patient's condition is good.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MAESTRO 4000¿ CONTROLLER
Type of Device
CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS, CARDIAC ABLATION, FOR TREATMENT OF ATRIAL FLUTTER
Manufacturer (Section D)
STELLARTECH RESEARCH CORPORATION
1346 bordeaux drive
sunnyvale CA 94089
Manufacturer (Section G)
STELLARTECH RESEARCH CORPORATION
1346 bordeaux drive
sunnyvale CA 94089
Manufacturer Contact
linda leimer
one scimed place
maple grove, MN 55311
7634941700
MDR Report Key5204372
MDR Text Key30494629
Report Number2134265-2015-07741
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OAD
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeFR
PMA/PMN Number
P020025
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/09/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received11/05/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberM00440000
Device Catalogue Number4000
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer11/09/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received02/25/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-