• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - GALWAY CAROTID WALLSTENT¿; STENT, CAROTID

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - GALWAY CAROTID WALLSTENT¿; STENT, CAROTID Back to Search Results
Model Number H965SCH647120
Device Problem Bent (1059)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 10/12/2015
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Age at time of event: 18 years or older.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported that stent damage occurred.The stenosed target lesion was located in the carotid artery.A 10.0-24 carotid wallstent¿ was selected to treat the lesion.The physician used two 0.14 190cm filterwire guide wires to advanced the stent.Resistance was felt and the stent was damage when expanding.The device was removed safely and another wallstent¿was used without problem.No patient complications were reported and the patient's status was fine and stable.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device evaluated by mfr: the complaint device was returned for analysis.The stent could not be deployed by pushing on the handle due to the multiple kinks and solidified blood on the device.The clear shrink tube was detached from the t-connector and bunching was observed 85mm distal of the point of no return mark on the stainless steel handle.This type of damage is consistent with the application of excessive force to the delivery system.The stent was deployed manually by pulling back the tip and inner while holding onto the outer.The stent and a section of inner immediately detached from the device due to the damage inflicted during the procedure.The stent did not fully expand due to solidified blood.The stent was soaked in a water bath at a temperature of 37 degrees to help soften the solidified blood.Stent expanded without issue.There were no issues noted with the profile of the stent.No other issues were identified during the product analysis.The manufacturing batch record review confirmed that the device met all material, assembly and performance specifications.The most probable root cause is operational context as device performance was limited due to anatomical procedural factors.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported that stent damage occurred.The stenosed target lesion was located in the carotid artery.A 10.0-24 carotid wallstent was selected to treat the lesion.The physician used two 0.14 190cm filterwire guide wires to advanced the stent.Resistance was felt and the stent was damage when expanding.The device was removed safely and another wallstent was used without problem.No patient complications were reported and the patient's status was fine and stable.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CAROTID WALLSTENT¿
Type of Device
STENT, CAROTID
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - GALWAY
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - GALWAY
Manufacturer Contact
linda leimer
one scimed place
maple grove, MN 55311
7634941700
MDR Report Key5210687
MDR Text Key30726335
Report Number2134265-2015-07505
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIM
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeTW
PMA/PMN Number
P050019
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/12/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received11/09/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date02/17/2017
Device Model NumberH965SCH647120
Device Catalogue NumberSCH-64712
Device Lot Number16315988
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/27/2015
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received02/29/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/21/2013
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-