Device review: the device was not returned to the manufacturer for physical evaluation.The customer was unable to provide the manufacturer with the lot number of the product used in the reported event.As no lot number was provided by the complainant, a record review was performed on each of the lot numbers shipped to the complainant in the three months leading up to the reported event.The record review found 2 lot number shipped to the customer during that time period.The batch production records for these lots were reviewed.The batch records confirmed that released product met specifications; and documented manufacturing process controls were within specification.Per the documented product investigation, there was no indication that the fresenius product caused, contributed to or was a factor in the reported event.The paper mdr submission (mfr report # 8030665-2015-00505) follow-up # 001 was submitted on 11/feb/2016 to the office of center for devices and radiological health and returned to fresenius medical care with a cover letter dated 17/feb/2016 stating the paper mdr submission was not accepted.Therefore, the report was resubmitted electronically via webtrader.
|