|
Model Number ESS305 |
Device Problems
Material Fragmentation (1261); Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395); Metal Shedding Debris (1804)
|
Patient Problems
Pain (1994); Uterine Perforation (2121); Foreign Body In Patient (2687)
|
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
This is a spontaneous case report received from a female consumer of unspecified age via regulatory authority fda maude (case# (b)(4)) in united states on 22-oct-2015.It refers to herself who had essure (fallopian tube occlusion insert) inserted.Consumer had to have a hysterectomy done 5 days ago ((b)(6) 2015), because her essure coils moved, making her have severe pain and bleed; shreads of nickel and pet fibers were found in her uterus.She is now off work for 2 months and suffering.Concomitant medications include cipro, adiphex, dulexis and alprazolam.The seriousness criteria hospitalization and disability were mentioned in the section event outcome but they were not specified and/or mentioned to one of the events in the narrative.Company causality comment: this non-medically confirmed, spontaneous case report refers to a female consumer who had a hysterectomy because essure (fallopian tube occlusion insert) coils moved.She stated shreads of nickel and pet fibers were found in her uterus (regarded as device breakage).Only device breakage is unlisted according to essure's reference safety information.During essure micro-insert therapy there is a risk that the device could move in/out of fallopian tubes; this movement could be an expulsion, dislocation or occur as a result of a uterine/fallopian tube perforation.In this case limited information was provided.Nevertheless; given events nature; causality with the suspect device cannot be excluded.This case was regarded as incident since device removal was required (hysterectomy performed) a product technical analysis and follow-up information are being sought.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Product technical complaint (ptc) investigation result received on 12-nov-2015: this adverse event report is related to a product technical complaint (ptc).The bayer reference number for the ptc report is: (b)(4).Final assessment: for cases where a device failure during insertion is reported, we conduct an investigation of any returned device.For cases where an insert is removed at a later time after insertion, we typically do not conduct an inspection of the insert.In this case, no product was returned.Since we have no valid lot number for this case, we were unable to conduct a review of the manufacturing batch record.We are unable to confirm any quality defect or device malfunction at this time.There was no event reported which indicates a new technical failure mode for the device.Medical assessment: no product quality defect was confirmed therefore a relationship to the reported medical events is excluded.The reported medical events are not indicative of a quality deficit per se.A review of similar cases is not applicable as no batch number was reported.The technical assessment concluded unconfirmed quality defect.Based on the available information, there is no relationship between the reported medical events and a quality defect.Company causality comment: this non-medically confirmed, spontaneous case report refers to a female consumer who had a hysterectomy because essure (fallopian tube occlusion insert) coils moved.She stated threads of nickel and pet fibers were found in her uterus (regarded as device breakage).Device breakage is anticipated according to the technical analysis, while the reported device movement is listed in essure's reference safety information.During essure micro-insert therapy there is a risk that the device could move in/out of fallopian tubes; this movement could be an expulsion, dislocation or occur as a result of a uterine/fallopian tube perforation.In this case limited information was provided.Nevertheless; given events nature; causality with the suspect device cannot be excluded.This case was regarded as incident since device removal was required (hysterectomy performed).The technical assessment concluded unconfirmed quality defect.Based on the available information, there is no relationship between the reported medical events and a quality defect.Follow-up information is being sought.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Follow-up information received on 18-dec-2015: attempts of follow-up were made with no response to date.Case closed.Company causality comment: this non-medically confirmed, spontaneous case report refers to a female consumer who had a hysterectomy because essure (fallopian tube occlusion insert) coils moved.She stated shreads of nickel and pet fibers were found in her uterus (regarded as device breakage).Device breakage is anticipated according to the technical analysis, while the reported device movement is listed in essure's reference safety information.During essure micro-insert therapy there is a risk that the device could move in/out of fallopian tubes; this movement could be an expulsion, dislocation or occur as a result of a uterine/fallopian tube perforation.In this case limited information was provided.Nevertheless; given events nature; causality with the suspect device cannot be excluded.This case was regarded as incident since device removal was required (hysterectomy performed) the technical assessment concluded unconfirmed quality defect.Based on the available information, there is no relationship between the reported medical events and a quality defect.No further information is expected.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Data correction for us reporting: the code knh was replaced with hhs.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|