• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: C.R. BARD, INC. (GFO) LUTONIX 035 DRUG COTED BALLOON PTA CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

C.R. BARD, INC. (GFO) LUTONIX 035 DRUG COTED BALLOON PTA CATHETER Back to Search Results
Model Number 9004
Device Problem Deflation Problem (1149)
Patient Problem Vascular System (Circulation), Impaired (2572)
Event Date 10/22/2015
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Analysis: the sample was retained by the user facility; therefore, evaluation was unable to be performed.Multiple attempts to obtain product identifiers and additional event details were unsuccessful; therefore, a lot history review and a device history record (dhr) were not able to be reviewed for this device.Conclusion: the actual sample was not received for evaluation, but it was retained by the user facility.If additional information is obtained, a supplement report will be submitted with all relevant information.The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.Actual device not evaluated.
 
Event Description
It was reported that after treatment with a lutonix percutaneous transluminal drug coated balloon (dcb) dilatation catheter, allegedly the balloon would not deflate completely.The health care professional (hcp) treated the target lesion and then decided to use the lutonix dcb a second time at an unknown location.The hcp noted when the second inflation was attempted, an air leak from the hub was heard.Reportedly, the balloon would not fully inflate; thus, the hcp attempted to deflate the balloon but it would not fully deflate either.Allegedly, the hcp then attempted to remove the lutonix dcb through the 6 french introducer sheath, but the hub separated from the catheter during retraction.After the hub separation, the catheter started to accordion towards the hemostasis valve of the introducer sheath.The hcp then attempted to remove the introducer sheath and lutonix dcb together, but the balloon was stuck in a highly calcified region of the common femoral artery, just distal to the end of the introducer sheath.The balloon likely became stuck because of the deflation difficulty.The patient was taken to the operating room and a femoral endarterectomy was performed to remove the balloon.The sample is being retained by the facility at this time and is not available for return.No further adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LUTONIX 035 DRUG COTED BALLOON PTA CATHETER
Type of Device
DRUG COTED BALLOON PTA CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
C.R. BARD, INC. (GFO)
289 bay road
queensbury NY 12804
Manufacturer (Section G)
C.R. BARD, INC. (GFO)
289 bay road
queensbury NY 12804
Manufacturer Contact
mike gaffney
9409 science center dr
new hope, MN 55428
7634458639
MDR Report Key5238052
MDR Text Key31672192
Report Number3006513822-2015-00062
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code ONU
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P130024
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type distributor,health profession
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 10/23/2015,10/27/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number9004
Device Catalogue NumberBSCLX351306100
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA10/23/2015
Distributor Facility Aware Date10/22/2015
Event Location Hospital
Date Report to Manufacturer11/02/2015
Initial Date Manufacturer Received Not provided
Initial Date FDA Received11/19/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age65 YR
-
-