(b)(4).The device was returned to atricure for evaluation.During examination, the magnet cap was found to contain cracks which lead to the reported magnet dislodgement.Therefore, this portion of the complaint was confirmed.However, there was nothing found that is believed to have contributed to the patient's adverse event.
|
It was reported by the sales rep.That during a tt maze procedure, using the atricure fusion 150 device, the magnet at the distal end of the device, dislodged.The facility reattached the magnet with dermabond, and proceed with the surgery.Post-operatively, it was reported (b)(6) 2015, the patient was in sinus rhythm but woke up sleepy and confused.A mri indicated that the patient had multiple significant embolic strokes on the left and right side.The patient was off by-pass pump and heparinized with 5000 units used during right side ablations, and none on the left side.The patient was released to rehab friday, (b)(6) 2015.He is conversing and may be blind in one eye.The neurologist is optimistic of his recovery.Although there was a report of a dislodged magnet, the magnet is not believed to be the cause or associated with the adverse event.
|