Catalog Number EX061703C |
Device Problems
Break (1069); Positioning Failure (1158); Fracture (1260); Sticking (1597)
|
Patient Problems
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199); No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
Event Date 11/03/2015 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The device history records are being reviewed.The event is currently under investigation.Although this product is not sold in the u.S., this event is being reported under regulation 21cfr part 803 as it involves a similar device to a pma approved device sold in the u.S.Under # p070014.The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant was unable to provide any patient details.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during the stent placement procedure, the deployment mechanism of the delivery system got stuck and the vascular stent could not be deployed.It was not possible to resheath or continue to deploy.The whole delivery system was broken in order to get access to the catheter the sheath was mounted on.During removal of the delivery system, the stent finally fractured inside the patient.The placement of additional stents was necessary to cover the area.No injury to the patient was reported.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The lot history records have been reviewed with special attention to the manufacturing and inspection of this product and the product was found to have met all specifications prior to shipment.There is no indication for a manufacturing-related failure.The evaluation of the returned device confirmed that the stent was being partially deployed and fractured during the attempt to remove the system from the patient.The condition of the device indicates the presence of high release force.The proximal stent end was found inside the introducer sheath leading to the conclusion that the distal stent end remained in the patient.It is also confirmed that the guide wire got stuck inside the system and that the system was disassembled for removal.Potential contributing factors to the reported event have been evaluated.Previous investigations of similar complaints have been reviewed.A difficult vessel anatomy, a challenging placement site or the use of inappropriate accessories may have contributed to the deployment failure.Reportedly, a smaller guide wire than recommended in the ifu was used during the procedure.The stent fracture was determined to be a consequence of the attempt to remove the partially deployed stent from the patient.The guide wire that was found stuck inside the inner lumen is considered a consequence of excessive release force and luminal deformation.On the basis of the information available, a definitive root cause for the reported event could not be determined.The ifu states: "if excessive force is felt during stent deployment, do not force the delivery system.Remove the delivery system and replace with a new unit." and "examine the stent and delivery system device for any damage.If it is suspected that the sterility or performance of the device has been compromised, the device should not be used." the ifu recommends the use of a 0.035 inch guide wire.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the vascular stent could not be deployed in the superior femoral artery.As reported the device has been flushed prior to use.A 0.018 inch guide wire was used.The lesion was pre-dilated.Reportedly during the stent placement procedure, the deployment mechanism of the delivery system got stuck and it was not possible to re-sheath or continue to deploy.The whole delivery system was broken in order to get access to the catheter the sheath was mounted on.During removal of the delivery system, the stent finally fractured inside the patient.The placement of additional stents was necessary to cover the area.No injury to the patient was reported.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|