• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK INC UNIVERSA SOFT URETERAL STENT SET; FAD STENT, URETERAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK INC UNIVERSA SOFT URETERAL STENT SET; FAD STENT, URETERAL Back to Search Results
Model Number N/A
Device Problem Difficult to Advance (2920)
Patient Problem Pain (1994)
Event Date 10/09/2015
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).The event is currently under investigation.
 
Event Description
According to the medsun report submitted by the user facility: event desc: stent would not advance with the guide wire.The guide wire was going through larger holes in the stent.It was not coiling in the bladder correctly.Patient pain also increases urge to urinate, requiring medication.This has reportedly occurred multiple times - md reports lot of friction and procedure takes longer.What was the original intended procedure? cysto rp with stent insertion.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Lot # requested but not provided.(b)(4).Investigation- a review of the complaint history, instructions for use (ifu), manufacturing instructions (mi), quality control (qc and trends was conducted for the purpose of this investigation.No product nor the lot number were returned to assist with this investigation.Manufacturing controls include detailed manufacturing instruction and inspection procedure for proper length and curl diameter.This product is manufactured to specification per mi.Additional processing controls include inspection per qc and has inspection for both the product length and curl dimensions.The ifu for the product used in this case details the proper placement procedure and guidance that: "accurate measurement enhances drainage efficiency and patient comfort.".Multiple factors could have contributed to the incorrect coil and pain, including not adhering to the placement instructions within the ifu and improper sizing of the stent based on patient anatomy.However, based on the limited available information a definitive root cause can not be determined or reported at this time.We will continue to monitor for similar complaints.Additional action is not required at this time, the residual risk remains at an acceptable level.
 
Event Description
According to the medsun report submitted by the user facility: event desc: stent would not advance with the guide wire.The guide wire was going through larger holes in the stent.It was not coiling in the bladder correctly.Patient pain also increases urge to urinate, requiring medication.This has reportedly occurred multiple times - md reports lot of friction and procedure takes longer.What was the original intended procedure: cysto rp with stent insertion.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNIVERSA SOFT URETERAL STENT SET
Type of Device
FAD STENT, URETERAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK INC
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer Contact
larry pool
750 daniels way
bloomington, IN 47404
8123392235
MDR Report Key5260714
MDR Text Key32552940
Report Number1820334-2015-00815
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FAD
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K961446
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type other
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 11/02/2015,11/10/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/02/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberN/A
Device Catalogue NumberUSH-624-RT1
Other Device ID NumberN/A
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA11/02/2015
Distributor Facility Aware Date10/09/2015
Event Location Hospital
Date Manufacturer Received11/13/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-