The customer reported that an antibody was identified with the screening cells biotestcell 3 but missed with the panel cells biotestcell-i11.The customer performed antibody screening and identification on two different tango optimo.The customer reported that an anti-e and anti-kp(a) could be identified.The customer did return the supposedly defective product and the patient sample that had caused a false negative result for investigational testing.Our quality control laboratory tested the patient sample with the supposedly defective product provided by the customer and yielded positive results.Testing in our quality control laboratory confirmed the presence of anti-e and anti-kp(a).The supposedly defective product was tested with different controls and samples.All positive and negative reactions were correct.We did not observe any false negative reaction.Testing by our quality control laboratory confirmed that the lot of biotestcell-i11 that was used during the false negative testing functions correctly.A review of the batch record documentation showed no irregularities which might have negatively affected the quality of the allegedly defective lot.The affected tango optimo was thoroughly inspected by a field service engineer.According to the field service report, all pipettor and camera alignments were verified.An 8-channel valve was found to be leaking and was replaced.A post service verification was completed and the instrument was operating within manufacturer's specifications and returned to full operation.On the next day after the initial field service, all controls were verified.The instrument is operating within manufacturer's specifications.
|