• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: FISHER & PAYKEL HEALTHCARE LTD AIRVO2 HUMIDIFIER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

FISHER & PAYKEL HEALTHCARE LTD AIRVO2 HUMIDIFIER Back to Search Results
Model Number PT101
Device Problem No Audible Alarm (1019)
Patient Problem No Patient Involvement (2645)
Event Date 12/07/2015
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).The complaint airvo humidifier is expected at our fisher & paykel healthcare regional office in the (b)(4) for evaluation.We will provide a follow up report upon completion of our investigation.
 
Event Description
A hospital in (b)(6) reported that the audible alarm of an airvo 2 humidifier was not working.This was found before patient use.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4) method: the complaint airvo humidifier was received at our fisher & paykel healthcare (fph) regional office in the uk where it was inspected by a trained fph technician.The device was performance tested and the audible alarm function was checked.The device was reportedly then sent to our new zealand office but it has not been received.Results: during testing at our regional office it was found that the visual alerts on the complaint airvo were operating, however no audible alarm was heard.Previous investigations into this type of failure have identified that the problem is caused by a faulty speaker and electrical resistance testing has shown the speaker's resistance to be open circuit.A lot check revealed one other complaint of this nature for lot number 130701.Conclusion: the supplier of the speaker unit was notified and they have carried out an investigation.The problem has been traced to an issue with the gluing process.The supplier has taken steps to ensure that each speaker is checked following the gluing process and any found faulty are discarded.Additional checks have also been implemented during production at our facility to ensure the speaker is working at the time of manufacture of the airvo.The subject airvo was manufactured before implementation of these measures.The airvo 2 user manual states that the "airvo is for the treatment of spontaneously breathing patients who would benefit from receiving high-flow, warmed and humidified respiratory gases." and that "the unit is not intended for life support." the user manual also contains instructions on how to check the alarm system functionality and states that "if either alarm signal is absent, do not use the unit.Contact your fisher & paykel healthcare representative.".
 
Event Description
A hospital in (b)(6) reported that the audible alarm of an airvo 2 humidifier was not working.This was found before patient use.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AIRVO2 HUMIDIFIER
Type of Device
AIRVO2 HUMIDIFIER
Manufacturer (Section D)
FISHER & PAYKEL HEALTHCARE LTD
15 maurice paykel place
east tamaki
auckland, 2013
NZ  2013
Manufacturer (Section G)
FISHER & PAYKEL HEALTHCARE LTD
15 maurice paykel place
east tamaki
auckland, 2013
NZ   2013
Manufacturer Contact
raymond yan
15365 barranca parkway
irvine, CA 92618-2216
9494534000
MDR Report Key5321111
MDR Text Key34199547
Report Number9611451-2015-00557
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code BTT
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUK
PMA/PMN Number
K131895
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/07/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberPT101
Device Catalogue NumberPT101
Device Lot Number130701003667
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 12/07/2015
Initial Date FDA Received12/22/2015
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received02/15/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured07/01/2013
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-