• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COVIDIEN PROTEGE RX CAROTID STENT SYSTEM; STENT, CAROTID

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COVIDIEN PROTEGE RX CAROTID STENT SYSTEM; STENT, CAROTID Back to Search Results
Model Number SECX-10-60-135
Device Problem Fracture (1260)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 11/27/2015
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
A review of the manufacture records for this device did not reveal any discrepancies relevant to the reported event.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
This procedure was performed in (b)(6).During procedure, the physician initially placed a 10-40 stent (non covidien stent) in the distal internal carotid artery through the bifurcation area.However, the stent was not covering the target lesion completely.As a result the physician decided to deploy an additional stent.The first stent attempted (non covidien/medtronic stent) could not cross the original stent that was deployed.As a result a guiding catheter and wire were used to cross the lesion and a 4x40 (non covidien/medtronic) balloon was inflated.The balloon did not inflate as expected so an additional 5x40 (non covidien/medtronic) balloon was used.Next the physician chose to use a protege rx stent.Due to tortuous anatomy, the tip of protege rx was shaped a little bit in order to advance through original stent.The physician managed to deliver the protege to the target lesion and deployed it successfully without post dilatation.The physician was planning to deliver a guidewire as distal protection but gave up since there was no collateral circulation.The procedure was completed.After a few days, echo image was taken and an abnormality of protege rx stent was noticed.Ct image was taken im mediately and the physician confirmed the protege rx stent was fractured.No medical intervention was required.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This mdr is being submitted as a part of a retrospective review / remediation effort performed at the covidien (b)(4) location, following medtronic's acquisition of covidien.A capa has been opened to manage the actions related to remediation of complaint files and any required mdr reporting.
 
Event Description
Cine image review: multiple cine images of the deployed stent were provided by the customer.The cine images were reviewed and observed.The stent showed serpentine bending and compression of the struts in the center portion of the deployed stent.No fracture of the struts could be clearly identified.From the review of the cine images, no elongation of the deployed stent was noted and there is no indication that there were any issues deploying the stent.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PROTEGE RX CAROTID STENT SYSTEM
Type of Device
STENT, CAROTID
Manufacturer (Section D)
COVIDIEN
4600 nathan lane north
plymouth MN 55442
Manufacturer (Section G)
COVIDIEN
4600 nathan lane n
plymouth MN 55442
Manufacturer Contact
mary haufek
4600 nathan lane n
plymouth, MN 55442
7633987000
MDR Report Key5322577
MDR Text Key35012785
Report Number2183870-2015-07616
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIM
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
P060001
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/03/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/23/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date03/10/2016
Device Model NumberSECX-10-60-135
Device Catalogue NumberSECX-10-60-135
Device Lot Number9881082
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received12/03/2015
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Date Device Manufactured03/11/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-