• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK INC UNIVERSA FIRM URETERAL STENT SET; FAD STENT, URETERAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK INC UNIVERSA FIRM URETERAL STENT SET; FAD STENT, URETERAL Back to Search Results
Model Number N/A
Device Problem Material Separation (1562)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 12/15/2015
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).The event is currently under investigation.
 
Event Description
The tether on the device appeared to stretch and then snapped.When the physician pulled the device out of the patient, there were a couple of random tether fragments on the device.The physician had to use forceps to remove these fragmented tethers.The physician elected to use a stent from another manufacturer to complete the procedure.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient's body.The patient did not require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Evaluation- a review of the complaint history, device history record, instructions for use (ifu), manufacturing instructions (mi), quality control (qc) and trends was conducted for the purpose of this investigation.Product was not returned to assist with this investigation.This product is manufactured per mi.The product is inspected per qc and has inspection for the tethering.The following is verified: proper placement of suture within the stent; proper type of suture; proper handle, location and length; a secure knot.Inspection assures that the tether is not tangled around the stent.Review of the device lot records and non-conformance history did not observe any quality related concerns associated with this case.The ifu details: "the stent may be removed easily by gentle withdrawal traction using endoscopic forceps." based on the information provided, the root cause is unable to be determined or reported at this time.We will continue to monitor for similar complaints.
 
Event Description
The tether on the device appeared to stretch and then snapped.When the physician pulled the device out of the patient, there were a couple of random tether fragments on the device.The physician had to use forceps to remove these fragmented tethers.The physician elected to use a stent from another manufacturer to complete the procedure.A section of the device did not remain inside the patient's body.The patient did not require any additional procedures due to this occurrence.According to the initial reporter, the patient did not experience any adverse effects due to this occurrence.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNIVERSA FIRM URETERAL STENT SET
Type of Device
FAD STENT, URETERAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK INC
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer Contact
larry pool
750 daniels way
bloomington, IN 47404
8123392235
MDR Report Key5328863
MDR Text Key34427643
Report Number1820334-2015-00842
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FAD
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K961446
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/15/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberN/A
Device Catalogue NumberUFH-626-RT1
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Distributor Facility Aware Date12/15/2015
Device Age2 MO
Event Location Hospital
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 12/15/2015
Initial Date FDA Received12/28/2015
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received03/28/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured10/27/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age67 YR
-
-