• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BIOTRONIK SE & CO. KG LUMAX 540 HF-T; CRT-D

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BIOTRONIK SE & CO. KG LUMAX 540 HF-T; CRT-D Back to Search Results
Model Number 360347
Device Problem Premature Elective Replacement Indicator (1483)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 07/05/2015
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
After an implantation period of about 39 months, a battery depletion was reported.The icd was explanted and returned to biotronik for analysis.No adverse patient side effects have been reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Upon receipt, the device interrogation revealed the battery status eos activated on (b)(6) 2015.The device was implanted for 43 months and a number of 13 charging cycles was documented to the device memory.The icd was subjected to an electrical inspection.The inspection of the battery condition showed a depleted battery, confirming the activated eos state.Therefore, the current consumption of the icd was measured revealing no anomalies.All measured data were found to be normal and as expected.The amount of charge taken from the battery with respect to the battery voltage was verified, revealing an inconsistency.Therefore, the device was opened and the inner assembly inspected.Visually no deficiencies were observed.The eos status was removed with a technical programmer and the electronic module was attached to an external power supply followed by a subsequent analysis.During the thorough analysis no indication for a device malfunction was found, in particular the current consumption of the electronic module was normal and as expected throughout all measurements.Furthermore, the ability of the device to deliver therapies was verified.The anti-bradycardia pacing pulses proved to be normal and in amplitude and frequency as programmed.A fibrillation signal was applied and the device delivered a defibrillation shock as specified, documenting a correct sensing and shock delivery.In particular, the specified energy level was reached and the charging time was as expected.There was no indication of a malfunction of the electronic module.Therefore the battery was sent to the manufacturer for further analysis.The manufacturing records of the battery were inspected, documenting that the battery parameters were within specification during the battery manufacturing.No anomalies were documented during the production process, associated to this battery.The following inspection of the battery did not reveal any signs of damage.The voltage measurement confirmed a depleted battery.There was no indication of a battery failure.In conclusion, despite a thorough analysis of the device no conclusion could be drawn regarding the root cause for the battery status eos.During the analysis the device behavior was found to be normal and as expected.There was no indication for a device malfunction.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LUMAX 540 HF-T
Type of Device
CRT-D
Manufacturer (Section D)
BIOTRONIK SE & CO. KG
woermannkehre 1
berlin D-123 59
GM  D-12359
Manufacturer Contact
6024 jean road
lake oswego, OR 97035
8772459800
MDR Report Key5330870
MDR Text Key34512438
Report Number1028232-2015-04577
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIK
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGM
PMA/PMN Number
P050023
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/11/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/28/2015
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number360347
Device Catalogue NumberSEE MODEL NO.
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received03/14/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured01/27/2012
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization;
-
-