• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BIOMET ORTHOPEDICS M2A-T UNIV 2-HOLE SHL SZ 41/52; PROSTHESIS, HIP

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BIOMET ORTHOPEDICS M2A-T UNIV 2-HOLE SHL SZ 41/52; PROSTHESIS, HIP Back to Search Results
Model Number N/A
Device Problems Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395); Malposition of Device (2616)
Patient Problems Toxicity (2333); No Information (3190)
Event Date 03/10/2011
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The product identification necessary to review manufacturing history was not provided.Current information is insufficient to permit a conclusion as to the cause of the event.The article was written by wataru ando, kengo yamamoto, takashi atsumi, satoshi tamaoki, kazuhiro oinuma, hideaki shiratsuchi, hirohiko tokunaga, yutaka inaba, naomi kobayashi, masaharu aihara and kenji ohzono.Event is being reported to fda on one medwatch as the limited information available indicates that a revision procedure is (or may be) needed.Should additional information be received regarding a revision procedure, the complaint will be reassessed and further medwatch reports will be submitted, if necessary.This information was originally reported on 1825034-2015-05110 which referenced a journal article written on a study that this patient took part in.
 
Event Description
Information was received based on review of a journal article titled, "comparison between component designs with different femoral head size in metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty; multicenter randomized prospective study" which aimed to investigate potential advantages of magnum group compared to conventional group in terms of range of motion, dislocation while maintaining the same function improvement and pain reduction; and to investigate metal ion release in asian population.A patient was identified in the article that underwent total hip arthroplasty on an unknown date.Subsequently, elevated metal ions, increased cup inclination angle and cup anteversion were reported.There has been no further information provided and the patient outcome is unknown.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This follow-up report is being filed to relay additional information, which was unknown at the time of the initial medwatch.Review of device history records show that lot released with no recorded anomaly or deviation.There are warnings in the package insert that state that this type of event can occur: under possible adverse effects, number 8 states, "dislocation and subluxation due to inadequate fixation and improper positioning.Muscle and fibrous tissue laxity can also contribute to these conditions." number 15 states, "elevated metal ion levels have been reported with metal-on-metal articulating surfaces." this report is number 1 of 2 mdrs filed for the same event (reference 1825034-2016-00011 / 00177).
 
Event Description
Information was received based on review of a journal article titled, "comparison between component designs with different femoral head size in metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty; multicenter randomized prospective study" which aimed to investigate potential advantages of magnum group compared to conventional group in terms of range of motion, dislocation while maintaining the same function improvement and pain reduction; and to investigate metal ion release in asian population.A patient was identified in the article that underwent total right hip arthroplasty on (b)(6) 2011.Subsequently, elevated metal ions, increased cup inclination angle and cup anteversion were reported.Additional information reported the patient dislocated on (b)(6) 2011.No revision procedure has been reported to date.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This follow-up report is being filed to relay additional information, which was unknown at the time of the initial medwatch.This report is number 1 of 3 mdrs filed for the same patient (reference 1825034-2016-00011 / 00177 / 03192).Remains implanted.
 
Event Description
Information was received based on review of a journal article titled, "comparison between component designs with different femoral head size in metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty; multicenter randomized prospective study" which aimed to investigate potential advantages of magnum group compared to conventional group in terms of range of motion, dislocation while maintaining the same function improvement and pain reduction; and to investigate metal ion release in asian population.A patient was identified in the article that underwent total right hip arthroplasty.Subsequently, elevated metal ions, increased cup inclination angle and cup anteversion were reported.Patient experienced a dislocation eight days post-implantation.No revision procedure has been reported to date.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
M2A-T UNIV 2-HOLE SHL SZ 41/52
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, HIP
Manufacturer (Section D)
BIOMET ORTHOPEDICS
56 e. bell drive
warsaw IN 46582
Manufacturer (Section G)
BIOMET ORTHOPEDICS
56 e. bell drive
warsaw IN 46582
Manufacturer Contact
megan haas
56 e. bell drive
warsaw, IN 46582
5743726700
MDR Report Key5340542
MDR Text Key34931431
Report Number0001825034-2016-00011
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KWY
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
PK003363
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,literature
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 07/22/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received01/04/2016
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Physician
Device Expiration Date06/30/2014
Device Model NumberN/A
Device Catalogue Number15-103682
Device Lot Number262900
Other Device ID NumberN/A
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received07/22/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured06/24/2004
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Removal/Correction NumberN/A
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age64 YR
Patient Weight57
-
-