• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BIOTRONIK SE & CO. KG LUMAX 540 HF-T; CRT-D

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BIOTRONIK SE & CO. KG LUMAX 540 HF-T; CRT-D Back to Search Results
Model Number 360347
Device Problem Premature End-of-Life Indicator (1480)
Patient Problem Patient Problem/Medical Problem (2688)
Event Date 11/20/2015
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
Ous mdr.An eos alert was sent via home monitoring regarding this patient's crt-d.The patient was brought in for an appointment where it was discovered an mri had been performed and cardiology had not been contacted even though the patient told the radiologist about the device.The patient had a revision done and this device was removed.The leads showed no abnormalities in measurements and on fluoroscopy.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The icd first underwent a status interrogation, during which the device status eos was confirmed.The icd had been implanted for a period of 36 months, and 19 charge processes were documented.During the electrical analysis, the memory content of the icd was examined first.The available iegm from (b)(6) 2015 showed interference signals in all channels.In addition, it was noted that the battery status eos was detected on the same day at 11:01 a.M.The frequency and morphology of the sensed interference signals, as well as the eos detection, are with high probability the result of the influence of a strong external magnetic field, which indicates the beginning of the reported magnetic resonance tomography.The signal sensing of the icd was checked and proved to be free of noise.The icd sensed supplied signals free of interference.The eos state was removed with a technical programmer, and the device then showed the state mol1.The battery voltage of 2.87 v indicates a charged battery.The icd's capability to provide therapy was tested.The antibradycardic output signal was normal and matched the programmed values.A fibrillation signal was supplied, and the device reacted according to specifications with a defibrillation shock.The specified energy level was reached.In particular, the charge time proved to be unremarkable.There were no indications of a device malfunction, the device proved to be fully functional.In summary, the therapeutic functions and the device data were thoroughly analyzed.During the analysis, the implant proved to be within the electrical specifications.There was no indication of a device malfunction.It is therefore very likely that the observed device behavior resulted from the influence of the strong external magnetic field during the magnetic resonance tomography.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LUMAX 540 HF-T
Type of Device
CRT-D
Manufacturer (Section D)
BIOTRONIK SE & CO. KG
woermannkehre 1
berlin D-123 59
GM  D-12359
Manufacturer Contact
6024 jean road
lake oswego, OR 97035
8772459800
MDR Report Key5358176
MDR Text Key35615225
Report Number1028232-2015-04762
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIK
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGM
PMA/PMN Number
P050023
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/18/2015
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number360347
Device Catalogue NumberSEE MODEL NO.
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 12/18/2015
Initial Date FDA Received01/11/2016
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received05/16/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/16/2012
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization;
-
-