• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ZOLL MANUFACTURING CORPORATION LIFEVEST WCD 4000 SYSTEM; WEARABLE CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ZOLL MANUFACTURING CORPORATION LIFEVEST WCD 4000 SYSTEM; WEARABLE CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATOR Back to Search Results
Model Number WCD 4000
Device Problems Signal Artifact/Noise (1036); Inappropriate/Inadequate Shock/Stimulation (1574); Invalid Sensing (2293)
Patient Problem No Code Available (3191)
Event Date 12/16/2015
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
There was no death or device malfunction associated with the inappropriate defibrillation events.Device evaluation summary: electrode belt (b)(4) and monitor (b)(4) were returned and evaluated at the distributor, in accordance with procedures recommended by zoll manufacturing corporation.The evaluation included review of downloaded software flag files (attached) on the day of the event and incoming functional testing.The review of the software flags consisted of an analysis of the downloaded data to identify any fault flags or unusual patterns of software flags.The software flag files did not suggest a device malfunction that would contribute to the inappropriate treatment.During the incoming functional testing, a 1hz simulated normal sinus rhythm signal was applied to the ecg electrodes, followed by a 5hz simulated treatable arrhythmia signal which verified proper performance of the detection algorithm.During the transition to the 5hz signal, the device was confirmed to properly enter into a treatment sequence which includes a verification of the tactile vibration alarm, audio messaging, and siren alarms, as well as a test of the pulse delivery circuitry.The pulse delivery circuitry test verified proper charging of the high voltage capacitors and proper delivery of five full energy 150j biphasic pulses.The functional testing confirmed proper response button functionality, ecg acquisition, detection algorithm performance, and pulse delivery functionality.Device manufacture date: monitor (b)(4): (b)(6) 2011 reuse.Electrode belt (b)(4): (b)(6) 2012 reuse.Additional inappropriate defibrillation narrative: the investigation into the event concludes that there was no device malfunction.A cause and effect analysis was conducted using all of the available information which includes the incident report, device evaluation, software flag files, and ecg strips.The primary cause of the inappropriate shock event was lack of response button use prior to shock delivery.The ecg analysis, conducted by trained ecg technicians, identified the primary cause of the false detection was multiple counting of tall t-waves and motion artifact.The source of motion artifact cannot be positively identified through cause and effect analysis.The following factors could not be ruled out as contributing causes to the artifact: body motion improper garment laundering poor ecg contact with skin inappropriate defibrillations are an anticipated risk associated with the use of the lifevest.Patients are instructed through alarms, voice messages, ifu, and training to press the response buttons to prevent an inappropriate defibrillation.The current commercial inappropriate defibrillation rate is consistent with the observed rate during the pivotal clinical trial (b)(4) (0.69% per patient-month with 90% confidence).A summary of the safety and effectiveness data (ssed), including the inappropriate defibrillation safety objective supporting fda's approval of the lifevest.
 
Event Description
A us distributor contacted zoll to report that a patient experienced an inappropriate defibrillation event consisting of two shocks.It was reported that the patient was laying in his bed at his skilled nursing facility during the event.Multiple counting of tall t-waves and motion artifact contributed to the false detection.The response buttons were not pressed during the event.Following the event, the patient was taken to the hospital via ems and continues use of the lifevest.There was no death or device malfunction associated with the inappropriate defibrillation event.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LIFEVEST WCD 4000 SYSTEM
Type of Device
WEARABLE CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
ZOLL MANUFACTURING CORPORATION
121 gamma drive
pittsburgh PA 15238 3495
Manufacturer (Section G)
ZOLL MANUFACTURING CORPORATION
121 gamma drive
pittsburgh PA 15238 3495
Manufacturer Contact
gabrielle salazar
121 gamma drive
pittsburgh, PA 15238-3495
4129683333
MDR Report Key5360004
MDR Text Key35656434
Report Number3008642652-2016-00139
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MVK
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
P010030
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type distributor
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 01/11/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Model NumberWCD 4000
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 12/18/2015
Initial Date FDA Received01/12/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured07/13/2011
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Other;
Patient Age83 YR
-
-